Your message dated Fri, 15 Apr 2016 19:37:37 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#820703: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #820703,
regarding RM: openjdk-7 -- RoQA; superseded by openjdk-8; will maintained in
experimental only
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
820703: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=820703
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ftp.debian.org
Control: blocks -1 by 820700 820675
X-Debbugs-CC: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
For the same reasons for openjdk-6 last year (#796099), please remove
openjdk-7 from unstable.
It is still kept and updated in experimental, since this is the staging
ground for the security updates for wheezy and jessie.
Removing it from unstable avoids confusion and users installing
outdated, insecure binaries.
mattia@coccia ~ % dak rm -Rn openjdk-7 avian openjdk-7-jre-dcevm
Will remove the following packages from unstable:
[...]
Checking reverse dependencies...
# Broken Depends:
libreoffice: libreoffice-subsequentcheckbase
Dependency problem found.
dak rm -Rn openjdk-7 avian openjdk-7-jre-dcevm 17.20s user 0.83s system 36%
cpu 50.039 total
mattia@coccia ~ %
Now, I think that broken depends is a misdetection of dak that thinks
libreoffice-subsequentcheckbase recursively depends on openjdk-7 through
a virtual package provided (also) by it, so it should good to force.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
icedtea-7-jre-jamvm | 7u95-2.6.4-1+b1 | amd64, armel, armhf, i386,
kfreebsd-i386, powerpc
icedtea-7-jre-jamvm | 7u95-2.6.4-1+b2 | kfreebsd-amd64
openjdk-7 | 7u91-2.6.3-1 | source
openjdk-7 | 7u95-2.6.4-1 | source
openjdk-7-dbg | 7u91-2.6.3-1 | mips
openjdk-7-dbg | 7u95-2.6.4-1 | mips64el, mipsel
openjdk-7-dbg | 7u95-2.6.4-1+b1 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386,
kfreebsd-i386, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x
openjdk-7-dbg | 7u95-2.6.4-1+b2 | kfreebsd-amd64
openjdk-7-demo | 7u91-2.6.3-1 | mips
openjdk-7-demo | 7u95-2.6.4-1 | mips64el, mipsel
openjdk-7-demo | 7u95-2.6.4-1+b1 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386,
kfreebsd-i386, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x
openjdk-7-demo | 7u95-2.6.4-1+b2 | kfreebsd-amd64
openjdk-7-doc | 7u91-2.6.3-1 | all
openjdk-7-doc | 7u95-2.6.4-1 | all
openjdk-7-jdk | 7u91-2.6.3-1 | mips
openjdk-7-jdk | 7u95-2.6.4-1 | mips64el, mipsel
openjdk-7-jdk | 7u95-2.6.4-1+b1 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386,
kfreebsd-i386, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x
openjdk-7-jdk | 7u95-2.6.4-1+b2 | kfreebsd-amd64
openjdk-7-jre | 7u91-2.6.3-1 | mips
openjdk-7-jre | 7u95-2.6.4-1 | mips64el, mipsel
openjdk-7-jre | 7u95-2.6.4-1+b1 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386,
kfreebsd-i386, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x
openjdk-7-jre | 7u95-2.6.4-1+b2 | kfreebsd-amd64
openjdk-7-jre-headless | 7u91-2.6.3-1 | mips
openjdk-7-jre-headless | 7u95-2.6.4-1 | mips64el, mipsel
openjdk-7-jre-headless | 7u95-2.6.4-1+b1 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386,
kfreebsd-i386, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x
openjdk-7-jre-headless | 7u95-2.6.4-1+b2 | kfreebsd-amd64
openjdk-7-jre-lib | 7u91-2.6.3-1 | all
openjdk-7-jre-lib | 7u95-2.6.4-1 | all
openjdk-7-jre-zero | 7u95-2.6.4-1+b1 | amd64, i386, kfreebsd-i386, ppc64el
openjdk-7-jre-zero | 7u95-2.6.4-1+b2 | kfreebsd-amd64
openjdk-7-source | 7u91-2.6.3-1 | all
openjdk-7-source | 7u95-2.6.4-1 | all
------------------- Reason -------------------
RoQA; superseded by openjdk-8; will maintained in experimental only
----------------------------------------------
Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next
dinstall run at the earliest.
Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.
We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package
automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed
correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected].
The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/820703
This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
[email protected].
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
--- End Message ---
