Your message dated Tue, 19 Apr 2016 09:40:14 -0300
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#821803: vagrant depends on ruby >= 2.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #821803,
regarding vagrant depends on ruby >= 2.0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
821803: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=821803
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: vagrant
Version: 1.6.5+dfsg1-2
Running this version of vagrant (or newer) under Ruby 1.9 (e.g. at
oldstable) gives following error:
$ vagrant
/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/vagrant/pre-rubygems.rb:19:in `require_relative':
/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/vagrant/bundler.rb:223: syntax error, unexpected
tPOW (SyntaxError)
def internal_install(plugins, update, **extra)
^
Since double star syntax is valid in Ruby >= 2.0, it should be specified in
the dependency.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Control: tag -1 wontfix
Hello, thanks for your bug report.
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 09:03:16PM +0900, Puzzlet Chung wrote:
> Package: vagrant
> Version: 1.6.5+dfsg1-2
>
> Running this version of vagrant (or newer) under Ruby 1.9 (e.g. at
> oldstable) gives following error:
>
> $ vagrant
> /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/vagrant/pre-rubygems.rb:19:in `require_relative':
> /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/vagrant/bundler.rb:223: syntax error, unexpected
> tPOW (SyntaxError)
> def internal_install(plugins, update, **extra)
> ^
>
> Since double star syntax is valid in Ruby >= 2.0, it should be specified in
> the dependency.
Sorry but this is not how Debian works. You can't take any arbitrary
package from Debian N and have it magically working on Debian N-1. This
is not supported, and you should *not* do this unless you know exactly
what you are doing, and ready to fix it yourself.
In particular, the vagrant from jessie was never tested on wheezy, and
is not supposed to work. Additionally I won't make a stable update just
to encode that in the metadata.
--
Antonio Terceiro <[email protected]>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
