Your message dated Wed, 20 Apr 2016 13:33:19 +0200 with message-id <[email protected]> and subject line Re: [pkg-wine-party] Bug#821880: wine: libgnutls30 and libgnutls30:i386 conflict when trying to install wine32 has caused the Debian Bug report #821880, regarding wine: libgnutls30 and libgnutls30:i386 conflict when trying to install wine32 to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) -- 821880: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=821880 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: wine Version: 1.8.1-2 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? I attempted to install wine. I ran "sudo aptitude install wine". After trying to run the piece of software in wine it came back with a "wine: Bad EXE format" error. * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? After googling I attempted to install wine32. Here is the aptitude output: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- yghazal@yghazalThinkpad:~$ sudo aptitude install wine32 Note: selecting "wine32:i386" instead of the virtual package "wine32" The following NEW packages will be installed: i965-va-driver:i386{a} libasound2:i386{a} libasound2-plugins:i386{a} libasyncns0:i386{a} libattr1:i386{a} libavcodec57:i386{a} libavresample3:i386{a} libavutil55:i386{a} libcap2:i386{a} libcrystalhd3:i386{a} libdb5.3:i386{a} libdbus-1-3:i386{a} libflac8:i386{a} libfontconfig1:i386{a} libfreetype6:i386{a} libgcrypt20:i386{a} libglib2.0-0:i386{a} libglu1-mesa:i386{a} libgmp10:i386{a} libgnutls30:i386{ab} libgomp1:i386{a} libgpg-error0:i386{a} libgpm2:i386{a} libgsm1:i386{a} libhogweed4:i386{a} libice6:i386{a} libicu55:i386{a} libidn11:i386{a} libjack-jackd2-0:i386{a} libjson-c3:i386{a} liblcms2-2:i386{a} libldap-2.4-2:i386{a} liblzma5:i386{a} libmp3lame0:i386{a} libmpg123-0:i386{a} libncurses5:i386{a} libnettle6:i386{a} libnuma1:i386{a} libogg0:i386{a} libopenal1:i386{a} libopenjpeg5:i386{a} libopus0:i386{a} liborc-0.4-0:i386{a} libp11-kit0:i386{a} libpcap0.8:i386{a} libpcre3:i386{a} libpng16-16:i386{a} libpulse0:i386{a} libsamplerate0:i386{a} libsasl2-2:i386{a} libsasl2-modules:i386{a} libsasl2-modules-db:i386{a} libschroedinger-1.0-0:i386{a} libselinux1:i386{a} libshine3:i386{a} libsm6:i386{a} libsnappy1v5:i386{a} libsndfile1:i386{a} libsoxr0:i386{a} libspeex1:i386{a} libspeexdsp1:i386{a} libssl1.0.2:i386{a} libswresample2:i386{a} libswscale4:i386{a} libsystemd0:i386{a} libtasn1-6:i386{a} libtheora0:i386{a} libtwolame0:i386{a} libuuid1:i386{a} libva-x11-1:i386{a} libva1:i386{a} libvdpau-va-gl1:i386{a} libvdpau1:i386{a} libvorbis0a:i386{a} libvorbisenc2:i386{a} libvpx3:i386{a} libwavpack1:i386{a} libwebp5:i386{a} libwine:i386{a} libwrap0:i386{a} libx264-148:i386{a} libx265-79:i386{a} libxcursor1:i386{a} libxi6:i386{a} libxml2:i386{a} libxrender1:i386{a} libxtst6:i386{a} libxvidcore4:i386{a} libzvbi0:i386{a} mesa-vdpau-drivers:i386{a} ocl-icd-libopencl1:i386{a} va-driver-all:i386{a} vdpau-driver-all:i386{a} vdpau-va-driver:i386{a} wine32:i386 0 packages upgraded, 95 newly installed, 0 to remove and 54 not upgraded. Need to get 52.6 MB of archives. After unpacking 269 MB will be used. The following packages have unmet dependencies: libgnutls30 : Breaks: libgnutls30:i386 (!= 3.4.10-4) but 3.4.11-3 is to be installed libgnutls30:i386 : Breaks: libgnutls30 (!= 3.4.11-3) but 3.4.10-4 is installed The following actions will resolve these dependencies: Keep the following packages at their current version: 1) libgnutls30:i386 [Not Installed] 2) libldap-2.4-2:i386 [Not Installed] 3) libwine:i386 [Not Installed] 4) wine32:i386 [Not Installed] Accept this solution? [Y/n/q/?] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pressing Y will install nothing, pressing n will give me an alternative outcome in which it unisntalls quite a few packages such as libreoffice, network-manager etc. I then tried rm -rf ~/.wine and installing libwine and wine-development before running wine. this time it tells me Could not load wine-gecko. HTML rendering will be disabled. Could not load wine-gecko. HTML rendering will be disabled. * What was the outcome of this action? I am currently still unable to use wine. * What outcome did you expect instead? That it would work. -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.5.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages wine depends on: ii wine64 1.8.1-2 wine recommends no packages. Versions of packages wine suggests: pn dosbox <none> pn wine-binfmt <none> Versions of packages wine is related to: ii fonts-wine 1.8.1-2 ii wine 1.8.1-2 pn wine32 <none> ii wine64 1.8.1-2 -- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---On 04/20/2016 09:12 AM, Yusef Ghazal wrote: > * What led up to the situation? > I attempted to install wine. I ran "sudo aptitude install wine". After > trying > to run the piece of software in wine it came back with a "wine: Bad EXE > format" error. > * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or > ineffective)? > After googling I attempted to install wine32. Here is the aptitude > output: This is the correct solution for the observed problem. See Adam's comment why it fails atm in a pure sid environment. You may use some packages from stretch (testing) to workaround this temporarily. > I then tried rm -rf ~/.wine and installing libwine and wine-development > before running > wine. this time it tells me libwine and wine-development are from different wine versions. There is one set of wine packages for wine (stable) without suffix, and another one for wine (development branch) with the suffix -development. So the one doesn't help when working the other. Yet it also doesn't hurt. You need wine, wine32 and libwine:i386 (or alternatively wine-development, wine32-development and libwine-development:i386) to run 32-bit Windows applications. > Could not load wine-gecko. HTML rendering will be disabled. > Could not load wine-gecko. HTML rendering will be disabled. This is a non-critical error, see #783428 and #812750. A workaround (install wine-gecko manually) is described in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=783428#35. Greets jre
--- End Message ---
