Your message dated Mon, 23 May 2016 18:36:59 +0000 with message-id <[email protected]> and subject line Bug#824972: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #209556, regarding The package description does not follow Debian policy to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) -- 209556: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=209556 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: gmt-tutorial-ps Version: 3.4-1 Severity: important Justification: section 2.3.3 Your package does not comply with the policy as it does not provide a proper extended descrition. Policy section 2.3.3 states: The description should be written so that it gives the system administrator enough information to decide whether to install the package. Take in account that package descriptions are very important to administrators to determine wether a package is (or isn't) useful for them and are used by package frontends in order to implement keyword-based searchs (samples include command line tools such as 'apt-cache search X' or 'grep-dctrl -F Description X' or even fancier interfaces such as 'dpkg-iasearch'). If you need help to provide a proper description for your package you are advised to digest the README/manpages/HTML files provided by the package or, as a last resort, request help at the debian-devel mailing list. If this package is being generated from a single source package and you already provide a full description in your control file for the main package, you might want to use it automatically in sub-packages. If this is the case consider using ${description}, and debian/substvars. This report has been automatically generated and the main reason is that the package has an extended description which is only one line long. Regards Javier Fernandez-Sanguino PS: For more information please read the Debian Policy or the thread at debian-devel started by Message-ID: <[email protected]> which is available at http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200306/msg01257.html
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Version: 3.4.4-1+rm Dear submitter, as the package gmt-doc-ps has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/824972 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [email protected]. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
--- End Message ---
