Your message dated Tue, 5 Jul 2016 18:06:17 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#828068: mixxx: Compile Mixxx for jessie-backports
has caused the Debian Bug report #828068,
regarding mixxx: Compile Mixxx for jessie-backports
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
828068: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=828068
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: mixxx
Version: 2.0.0~dfsg-4
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation? Old version on stable
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)? Compiled 2.0.0 for jessie without lib problems
* What was the outcome of this action? I could use mixxx without problems
* What outcome did you expect instead? That someone could compile and send
to jessie-backports
*** End of the template - remove these template lines ***
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.5
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (700, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=pt_BR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
Versions of packages mixxx depends on:
ii libc6 2.19-18+deb8u4
ii libchromaprint0 1.2-1
ii libflac8 1.3.0-3
ii libgcc1 1:4.9.2-10
ii libgl1-mesa-glx [libgl1] 10.3.2-1+deb8u1
ii libhidapi-libusb0 0.8.0~rc1+git20140201.3a66d4e+dfsg-3
ii libid3tag0 0.15.1b-11
ii libmad0 0.15.1b-8
ii libogg0 1.3.2-1
ii libopusfile0 0.6-1
ii libportaudio2 19+svn20140130-1
ii libportmidi0 1:184-2.2
ii libprotobuf-lite9 2.6.1-1
ii libqt4-network 4:4.8.6+git64-g5dc8b2b+dfsg-3+deb8u1
ii libqt4-opengl 4:4.8.6+git64-g5dc8b2b+dfsg-3+deb8u1
ii libqt4-script 4:4.8.6+git64-g5dc8b2b+dfsg-3+deb8u1
ii libqt4-scripttools 4:4.8.6+git64-g5dc8b2b+dfsg-3+deb8u1
ii libqt4-sql 4:4.8.6+git64-g5dc8b2b+dfsg-3+deb8u1
ii libqt4-sql-sqlite 4:4.8.6+git64-g5dc8b2b+dfsg-3+deb8u1
ii libqt4-svg 4:4.8.6+git64-g5dc8b2b+dfsg-3+deb8u1
ii libqt4-xml 4:4.8.6+git64-g5dc8b2b+dfsg-3+deb8u1
ii libqtcore4 4:4.8.6+git64-g5dc8b2b+dfsg-3+deb8u1
ii libqtgui4 4:4.8.6+git64-g5dc8b2b+dfsg-3+deb8u1
ii librubberband2 1.8.1-6
ii libshout3 2.3.1-3
ii libsndfile1 1.0.25-9.1+deb8u1
ii libsoundtouch0 1.8.0-1
ii libsqlite3-0 3.8.7.1-1+deb8u1
ii libstdc++6 4.9.2-10
ii libtag1c2a 1.9.1-2.1
ii libusb-1.0-0 2:1.0.19-1
ii libvamp-hostsdk3 2.5+repack0-2
ii libvamp-sdk2 2.5+repack0-2
ii libvorbis0a 1.3.4-2
ii libvorbisenc2 1.3.4-2
ii libvorbisfile3 1.3.4-2
ii libx11-6 2:1.6.2-3
ii mixxx-data 2.0.0~dfsg-4
mixxx recommends no packages.
Versions of packages mixxx suggests:
ii evince [pdf-viewer] 3.14.1-2+deb8u1
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2016-06-24 12:28:46, diogo wrote:
> Package: mixxx
> Version: 2.0.0~dfsg-4
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
>
> * What led up to the situation? Old version on stable
> * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
> ineffective)? Compiled 2.0.0 for jessie without lib problems
> * What was the outcome of this action? I could use mixxx without problems
> * What outcome did you expect instead? That someone could compile and send
> to jessie-backports
Please requests backports on [email protected].
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
