Your message dated Thu, 14 Jul 2016 11:01:52 +0200
with message-id <20160714090152.GA15730@feivel>
and subject line Re: Bug#798139: spampd: Syslog level NOTICE should be INFO 
instead
has caused the Debian Bug report #798139,
regarding spampd: Syslog level NOTICE should be INFO instead
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
798139: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=798139
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: spampd
Version: 2.30-22.2
Severity: minor

Spampd uses syslog level 2 (NOTICE) for all it's logging and now that we are using systemd and journald, these notices are in bold and attract unneeded attention. I solved the problem by replacing

$self->log(2, ...)

with

$self->log(3, ...)

All the best,
Ognyan

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, Sep 06, 2015 at 08:03:10AM +0300, Ognyan Kulev wrote:
> Spampd uses syslog level 2 (NOTICE) for all it's logging and now that we are
> using systemd and journald, these notices are in bold and attract unneeded
> attention. I solved the problem by replacing
> 
> $self->log(2, ...)
> 
> with
> 
> $self->log(3, ...)

I doubt changing all the entries just because you'd like to not see them
highlighted is a good move. You should only downgrade entries that should not
be notices. There may be a reason for a given entry to be on level notice.

Michael
-- 
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
Jabber: michael at xmpp dot meskes dot org
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to