Your message dated Mon, 18 Jul 2016 20:14:17 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#784236: Build-Depends on libelf-dev, but libelf
support no longer enabled
has caused the Debian Bug report #784236,
regarding Build-Depends on libelf-dev, but libelf support no longer enabled
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
784236: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=784236
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: glib2.0
Version: 2.44.0-2
Severity: normal
Since the update to 2.44.0, libelf support is no longer enabled.
Checking the build logs at [1], the configure check prints:
checking for LIBELF... no
The package still has a Build-Depends on libelf-dev. So it looks like an
unintended change which was overlooked and needs further investigation,
why the configure check fails.
[1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=glib2.0
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (200, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, 04 May 2015 12:29:31 +0100 Simon McVittie <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 04/05/15 11:56, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > Checking the build logs at [1], the configure check prints:
> >
> > checking for LIBELF... no
>
> ... but then it also prints:
>
> checking for elf_begin in -lelf... yes
> checking for elf_getshdrstrndx in -lelf... yes
> checking for elf_getshdrnum in -lelf... yes
> checking libelf.h usability... yes
> checking libelf.h presence... yes
> checking for libelf.h... yes
>
> As far as I can see from configure.ac, libelf support works if *either*
> the pkg-config check for libelf.pc passes, *or* the old-style checks for
> symbols and headers pass.
>
> Prior to 2.43.2-1 we used libelfg0-dev from src:libelf, which has
> libelf.pc; now we use libelf-dev from src:elfutils, which doesn't. See
> also <http://bugs.debian.org/769408>.
Right. Let's close this.
Emilio
--- End Message ---
