Your message dated Tue, 19 Jul 2016 23:18:36 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: [Pkg-julia-devel] Bug#831252: Bug#831252: julia: FTBFS: 
Tests failures
has caused the Debian Bug report #831252,
regarding julia: FTBFS: Tests failures
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
831252: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=831252
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: julia
Version: 0.4.6-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: [email protected]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160714 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.

Relevant part (hopefully):
> )
> Exception running test parallel :
> On worker 24:
> LoadError: Parallel test failed, cmd : `/«PKGBUILDDIR»/usr/bin/julia -Cx86-64 
> -J/«PKGBUILDDIR»/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/julia/sys.so --check-bounds=yes 
> --depwarn=error parallel_exec.jl`
>  [inlined code] from /«PKGBUILDDIR»/test/parallel.jl:13
>  in anonymous at ./no file:4294967295
>  in include_string at ./loading.jl:282
> while loading /«PKGBUILDDIR»/test/parallel.jl, in expression starting on line 
> 11
> 
> signal (11): Segmentation fault
> Segmentation fault
> make[2]: *** [all] Error 139
> Makefile:9: recipe for target 'all' failed
> make[1]: *** [override_dh_auto_test] Error 2
> make[2]: Leaving directory '/«PKGBUILDDIR»/test'
> debian/rules:74: recipe for target 'override_dh_auto_test' failed

The full build log is available from:
   
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2016/07/14/julia_0.4.6-1_unstable_gcc5.log

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from
Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every
failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,

On 18/07/16 at 16:55 -0400, Peter Colberg wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 05:51:35PM -0400, Peter Colberg wrote:
> > I rebuilt julia successfully five times on my amd64 machine with sbuild.
> 
> Decreasing severity to important to ensure julia stays in testing.
> 
> Apart from being unable to reproduce the test failures locally, a
> recent binNMU [1] was successful. Further autopkgtest [2] of the
> same test suite has passed continuously since uploading 0.4.6-1.
> 
> [1] 
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=julia&arch=amd64&ver=0.4.6-1%2Bb1&stamp=1468871883
> [2] https://ci.debian.net/packages/j/julia/unstable/amd64/

It might have been caused by the use of eatmydata to make the build
faster. I disabled it, and it built fine. I'm closing this bug.

Sorry about the noise.

Lucas

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to