Your message dated Fri, 3 Feb 2006 00:16:03 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#351114: mutt should not ask twice if user wants to quit on
blank subject
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Feb 2006 21:34:23 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 02 13:34:23 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 66-163-1-120.ip.tor.radiant.net ([66.163.1.120] helo=tea)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1F4m5s-0001wl-TU
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 02 Feb 2006 13:34:22 -0800
Received: (from localhost user: 'acli' uid#500 fake: STDIN ([EMAIL PROTECTED]))
by tea.staff.cccgt.org id S57094AbWBBVeE (ORCPT
<rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>); Thu, 2 Feb 2006 16:34:04 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: Ambrose Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Ambrose Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: mutt should not ask twice if user wants to quit on blank subject
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 16:34:04 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: mutt
Version: 1.5.11-5
Severity: wishlist
Scenario:
If a user sends some mail with blank subject (e.g., mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]),
mutt asks if the user wants to quit sending the mail.
The user answers no, and proceeds to type a long piece of email. After exiting
from
the editor, mutt asks *again* if the user wants to quit sending the mail. Worse
yet,
the default is "yes" (i.e., "don't send") even though the user had already
answered
"no" before and thought that he/she would not have to be bothered with the same
question again.
At this point,
1. It is very possible for the user to accidentally answer "yes" (e.g., by
accidentally
pressing the "Enter" key). Then the mail (which took a long time and a lot
of effort
to type) is lost forever, wasting the user's time and causing the user to
become
frustrated.
2. The user notices the question and re-answers "no". (But recall that the user
had
already made his/her intentions clear by answering "no" previously.)
Wishlist item:
The second question is both unnecessary and user-unfriendly. It can easily lead
to lost
mail and thus should not be there in the first place.
IMHO this is a serious usability problem.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.4.28-ow1
Locale: LANG=zh_TW.Big5, LC_CTYPE=zh_TW.Big5 (charmap=BIG5)
Versions of packages mutt depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.5-12 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libdb4.3 4.3.29-4 Berkeley v4.3 Database Libraries [
ii libgnutls12 1.2.9-2 the GNU TLS library - runtime libr
ii libidn11 0.5.18-1 GNU libidn library, implementation
ii libncursesw5 5.5-1 Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii libsasl2 2.1.19-1.9 Authentication abstraction library
ii zmailer [mail-transport-agent 2.99.56-2 Mailer for Extreme Performance Dem
Versions of packages mutt recommends:
ii locales 2.3.5-12.1 GNU C Library: National Language (
ii mime-support 3.35-1 MIME files 'mime.types' & 'mailcap
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 351114-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Feb 2006 23:16:06 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 02 15:16:06 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62]
helo=chistera.yi.org)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1F4ngM-0002PD-0h
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 02 Feb 2006 15:16:06 -0800
Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60)
id 1F4ngK-0003S8-6p; Fri, 03 Feb 2006 00:16:04 +0100
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 00:16:03 +0100
From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ambrose Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#351114: mutt should not ask twice if user wants to quit on
blank subject
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-No-CC: Please respect my Mail-Followup-To header
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060126
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
* Ambrose Li [Thu, 02 Feb 2006 18:02:48 -0500]:
> Hi Adeodato
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 11:55:35PM +0100, Adeodato Sim?? wrote:
> > (FWIW, I can't reproduce sending the mail; if one answers yes to this
> > second questions, mutt leaves you in the send-dialog again, waiting
> > for you to press either 'y' or 'q' again, for example.)
> Yes, you are right :-/
> Sorry for the trouble.
Hey, no problem. :) I'll just close the bug. ($abort_nosubject was
what you wanted, yes?)
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
Listening to: Ella Baila Sola - DespÃdete
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]