Your message dated Sat, 4 Feb 2006 14:25:49 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#350912: it works being AMD64 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --->From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 01 08:34:18 2006 Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Feb 2006 16:34:18 +0000 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from smtp5-g19.free.fr ([212.27.42.35]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F4Kvy-0008OB-2o for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 08:34:18 -0800 Received: from [192.168.0.1] (bro67-2-82-225-7-246.fbx.proxad.net [82.225.7.246]) by smtp5-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 214AA17F73 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 1 Feb 2006 17:34:17 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 17:36:15 +0100 From: Adrien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: (pas de sujet) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: installation-reports Boot method: netboot Image version: daily netboot i386 from people.debian.org/~joeyh/ Date: 20060131 Machine: Asus A8N-VM CSM (Nforce 430 / 6500) Processor: AMD64 3200+ Memory: 2 * 512 DDR Partitions: on Hitachi T7K250 250 Go (SATA II) 29996.3 MB NTFS 980.5 MB Linux Swap 18128.0 MB Linux Ext3 189367.8 MB Linux Ext3 Output of lspci and lspci -n: i'm not under linux right now... will send it after if needed Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot worked: [O] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [E] Detect CD: [ ] Load installer modules: [ ] Detect hard drives: [ ] Partition hard drives: [ ] Create file systems: [ ] Mount partitions: [ ] Install base system: [ ] Install boot loader: [ ] Reboot: [ ] Comments/Problems: Two network interfaces were detected where there is only one onboard. Then the DHCP configuration doesn't detect anything, so it's impossible to download the Releases file on the next step. I tryed to fill manually the IP/netmask/gateway/etc and it's the same. I found at least one person who had the same problem : http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=792214&postcount=212 It's strange as I didn't have this problem with the netboot CD for AMD64. Two interfaces were found too, but the configuration was successfully detected by DHCP and the rest of the installation was OK.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --->From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 04 05:32:11 2006 Received: (at 350912-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Feb 2006 13:32:11 +0000 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from gpm.stappers.nl ([213.84.119.166]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F5NWN-0003a0-5A for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 04 Feb 2006 05:32:11 -0800 Received: by gpm.stappers.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 39D7C794A0; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 14:25:49 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 14:25:49 +0100 To: Adrien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bug#350912: it works being AMD64 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Geert Stappers) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_44,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 01:26:06PM +0100, Adrien wrote: > Hi, as I didnt send the output of lspci and lspci -n last time, here is= =20 > the output of lspci : > And lspci -n : Sorted, stripped and blank lines added: 0000:00:14.0 0680: 10de:0269 (rev a1) 0000:00:14.0 Bridge: nVidia Corporation MCP51 Ethernet Controller (rev a1) 0000:00:18.0 0600: 1022:1100 0000:00:18.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron= ] HyperTransport Technology Configuration 0000:00:18.1 0600: 1022:1101 0000:00:18.1 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron= ] Address Map 0000:00:18.2 0600: 1022:1102 0000:00:18.2 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron= ] DRAM Controller 0000:00:18.3 0600: 1022:1103 0000:00:18.3 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron= ] Miscellaneous Control 0000:04:05.0 0c00: 1106:3044 (rev 80) 0000:04:05.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): VIA Technologies, Inc. IEEE 1394 Host=20 0000:04:09.0 0280: 1814:0201 (rev 01) 0000:04:09.0 Network controller: RaLink Ralink RT2500 802.11 Cardbus=20 > The problem was : >=20 > "Two network interfaces were detected where there is only one onboard.=20 > Then the DHCP configuration doesn't detect anything, so it's impossible= =20 > to download the Releases file on the next step. I tryed to fill manually= =20 > the IP/netmask/gateway/etc and it's the same. I found at least one=20 > person who had the same problem : >=20 > http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=3D792214&postcount=3D212 >=20 > It's strange as I didn't have this problem with the netboot CD for=20 > AMD64. Two interfaces were found too, but the configuration was=20 > successfully detected by DHCP and the rest of the installation was OK." :-) > Somebody said me that the second network interface was the firewire, but= =20 > I still can't use the network. Did I something wrong or is it an=20 > installer bug ? Nope. Neither an installer bug nor you doing something wrong. It is a good thing to be curious and play with technology. You found out that an AMD64 does differ from i386. > Thanks. I'm closing this bugreport. You have your AMD64 working as AMD64. That the AMD64 doesn't work as i386 at (low-level) hardware level ("driver"= ), is something you have to accept. Cheers Geert Stappers P.S. As always: feel free to tell more about the topic. Another point of view, does effect my opinion! (c: --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFD5KtdOSINbgwa/7sRAgj3AKCZdqItda5flpN0+Vc47OzllkfbgwCfR4eu GL+YzdMZBWRyXghKlHg8E90= =9N7y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF--
--- End Message ---
