Your message dated Sat, 04 Feb 2006 15:39:56 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#272427: no need to name files .pl in /usr/bin has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --->From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 19 16:44:49 2004 Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2004 23:44:49 +0000 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from smtp1.apol.com.tw [203.79.224.62] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C9BMP-0007BA-00; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 16:44:49 -0700 Received: from jidanni1 (tc218-187-80-210.2-7.dynamic.apol.com.tw [218.187.80.210]) by smtp1.apol.com.tw (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA2784615 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 07:44:43 +0800 (CST) Received: from jidanni by jidanni1 with local (Exim 4.34) id 1C9B34-0001cO-1e; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 07:24:50 +0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: no need to name files .pl in /usr/bin X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63 Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 07:24:49 +0800 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: bbdb Version: 2.34.cvs20030503-1 Severity: wishlist Idea: perhaps rename or link the .pl files in /usr/bin to versions without the unnecessary and inflexible .pl suffix. Also adjust the man pages.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --->From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 04 06:40:02 2006 Received: (at 272427-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Feb 2006 14:40:02 +0000 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.ganneff.de ([213.146.108.162] helo=ganneff.de) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F5Oa1-0007Z0-P5 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 04 Feb 2006 06:40:02 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganneff.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C333E0059; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 15:39:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from ganneff.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (goliath2 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 00320-01; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 15:39:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from vorlon.ganneff.de (vorlon [213.146.108.163]) by ganneff.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E308E0057; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 15:39:56 +0100 (CET) From: Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#272427: no need to name files .pl in /usr/bin In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Dan Jacobson's message of "Mon, 20 Sep 2004 07:24:49 +0800") Organization: Goliath-BBS References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-GPG-ID: 0x7E7B8AC9 X-GPG-FP: DF7D EB2F DB28 FD2B A9FB FA6D 715E D6A0 7E7B 8AC9 X-message-flag: Formating hard disk. please wait... 10%... 20%... Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 15:39:56 +0100 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ganneff.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_44,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 On 10053 March 1977, Dan Jacobson wrote: > Idea: perhaps rename or link the .pl files in /usr/bin to versions > without the unnecessary and inflexible .pl suffix. Also adjust the man > pages. Nope, there is no good reason to do that and if people use them in scripts they would have the unneccessary work to change that. -- bye Joerg <exa> And mind you, I have always been respectful to every debian developer EXCEPT Branden.
--- End Message ---
