Your message dated Sun, 5 Feb 2006 16:25:32 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line not applicable to debian faq
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
>From [email protected] Thu May 22 10:21:40 2003
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 May 2003 15:21:41 +0000
Return-path: <[email protected]>
Received: from port027.iris.dialup.bway.net (arroz.onshored.com)
[216.220.110.137]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19Irsy-0000h4-00; Thu, 22 May 2003 10:21:40 -0500
Received: by arroz.onshored.com (Postfix, from userid 421)
id 4706693827; Thu, 22 May 2003 11:21:48 -0400 (EDT)
From: Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FAQ: add entry about installing testing/unstable pkgs to stable
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 11:21:47 -0400
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_20
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_20
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: doc-debian
Version: N/A; reported 2003-05-22
Severity: wishlist
IMHO, there should be a FAQ entry about how to install newer versions
from testing/unstable onto stable.
That entry should include two pathways: finding a backported version
at www.apt-get.org (which makes it easy), or else how to add
testing/unstable (recommend testing) in /etc/apt/sources.list and
how to configure apt-get to use stable by default.
Maybe this entry is already in the FAQ, I couldn't find it.
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: sparc
Kernel: Linux arroz 2.4.18 #2 Thu Apr 11 14:37:17 EDT 2002 sparc64
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 05 07:25:35 2006
Received: (at 194308-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Feb 2006 15:25:35 +0000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gelfand.mdcc.cx ([80.126.189.155] helo=stegun.mdcc.cx)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1F5lle-0003jK-Rr
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 05 Feb 2006 07:25:35 -0800
Received: from nagy.mdcc.cx (nagy.mdcc.cx
[IPv6:2001:888:1a9b:0:204:e2ff:fe33:5ea5])
by stegun.mdcc.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D4E733B
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 5 Feb 2006 16:25:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: by nagy.mdcc.cx (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 494D52AC48E; Sun, 5 Feb 2006 16:25:32 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 16:25:32 +0100
From: Joost van Baal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: not applicable to debian faq
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WbqItKNU/G8FVTDf"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 8FC6 A40E 31B8 7E0E 2270 D7A9 0606 9CF2 9694 57F0
X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x969457F0
X-PGP-Key: http://mdcc.cx/~joostvb/joostvb_key.asc
X-Accept-Language: nl, en
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--WbqItKNU/G8FVTDf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
Op zo 1 jan 2006 om 12:59:04 +0100 schreef Joost van Baal op
http://lists.debian.org/debian-doc/2006/01/msg00000.html :
>=20
> Unless someone tells me not to, I'll close the "installing
> testing/unstable pkgs" one soonish.
Since nobody stepped up and said she disagrees with me and feels this
issue _is_ applicable to the Debian GNU/Linux FAQ, I'm closing this bug.
Bye,
Joost
--WbqItKNU/G8FVTDf
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)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=Xxp/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--WbqItKNU/G8FVTDf--
--- End Message ---
