Your message dated Mon, 5 Sep 2016 20:56:24 -0400
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line docbook-utils: allow opensp instead of sp dependency
has caused the Debian Bug report #249290,
regarding docbook-utils: allow opensp instead of sp dependency
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
249290: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=249290
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: docbook-utils
Version: 0.6.13-5
Severity: wishlist
Is it possible to make docbook-utils depend on opensp | sp, instead of
requiring sp? Or maybe just changing entirely from sp to opensp, since
my understanding is that openjade/opensp are better maintained these
days than jade/sp.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i586)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.5-1-386
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages docbook-utils depends on:
ii docbook-dsssl 1.78-4 modular DocBook DSSSL stylesheets,
ii jadetex 3.13-1 generator of printable output from
ii lynx 2.8.5-1 Text-mode WWW Browser
ii perl 5.8.3-3 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
ii sgmlspl 1.03ii-30 SGMLS-based example Perl script fo
ii sp 1.3.4-1.2.1-38 James Clark's SGML parsing tools
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package:docbook-utils
Version: 0.6.14-3.3
This was fixed by removing the dependency on sp completely, leaving only
the dependency on opensp.
--
Neil Roeth
--- End Message ---
