Your message dated Mon, 6 Feb 2006 11:00:35 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line 2 problems with pdf bookmarks has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --->From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 19 18:29:30 2002 Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 May 2002 23:29:30 +0000 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from postfix1-2.free.fr [213.228.0.130] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 179a7G-0007aR-00; Sun, 19 May 2002 18:29:30 -0500 Received: from localhost (nas-cbv-3-62-147-137-55.dial.proxad.net [62.147.137.55]) by postfix1-2.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEE91AB260; Mon, 20 May 2002 01:29:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dwitch by localhost with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 179aqV-0000HB-00; Mon, 20 May 2002 02:16:15 +0200 Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 02:16:15 +0200 From: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: texinfo: wrong PDF bookmarks are generated Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Reportbug-Version: 1.50 Sender: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: texinfo Version: 4.1-2 Severity: normal When formatting to PDF a texi manual with a peculiar sectionning (bigloo again :) the bookmarks (as seen in acroread) are wrong. The particular characteristic that causes the problem appears to be like \subsubsection right within a \section, which causes sections numbered like 2.0.2 - those sections do not get caught as children by the bookmarks engine, and eg. 2.0.2 appears on the same level as section 2, which is wrong. -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux bylbo 2.4.17-smp+evms+kdb #1 SMP mer mar 27 00:23:14 CET 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=français, LC_CTYPE=français Versions of packages texinfo depends on: ii libc6 2.2.5-5 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Why make M$-Bill richer & richer ? Debian-related: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Support Debian GNU/Linux: Pro: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratuity http://ydirson.free.fr/ | Check <http://www.debian.org/>
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --->From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 06 02:01:12 2006 Received: (at 147483-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Feb 2006 10:01:12 +0000 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from alpha.logic.tuwien.ac.at ([128.130.175.20]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F63BF-0001Pe-VA for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 06 Feb 2006 02:01:11 -0800 Received: from gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at ([128.130.175.3]) by alpha.logic.tuwien.ac.at with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1F63Ah-0002A5-00; Mon, 06 Feb 2006 11:00:35 +0100 Received: from preining by gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at with local (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1F63Ah-0005yO-00; Mon, 06 Feb 2006 11:00:35 +0100 Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 11:00:35 +0100 To: Karl Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 2 problems with pdf bookmarks Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i From: Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_44 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Dear Karl, dear Yann! I concur with Karl that a misbehaving of bookmarks generated from an incorrect document structure should not be considered as a bug. I am closing this bug, if you have any further complaints, please reopen it or a new one. On Fre, 03 Feb 2006, Karl Berry wrote: > Hi Norbert, > > Subsubsection without subsection within a section are on the wrong level > > Sorry, I can't get excited about this one. It seems a lot to ask for > the bookmarks to be "correct" when the document structuring is > incorrect. No doubt it could be fixed with enough time & effort, and if > anyone wants to work on it, they're welcome to do so :). > > Meanwhile, it would be better to fix the original document, seems to me. > For one thing that subsection number 0 will just be confusing to > readers. > > Thanks, > k Best wishes Norbert ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dr. Norbert Preining <preining AT logic DOT at> Università di Siena gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BURLINGJOBB A seventeenth-century crime by which excrement is thrown into the street from a ground-floor window. --- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
--- End Message ---
