Your message dated Fri, 6 Jan 2017 10:00:51 +0100
with message-id
<CAKjSHr0nn=awmee1h_lvqkvbxmxr+pn9g+hig55rn8pzzya...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#810349: linux-patch-grsecurity2: removal of
linux-patch-grsecurity2?
has caused the Debian Bug report #810349,
regarding linux-patch-grsecurity2: removal of linux-patch-grsecurity2?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
810349: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=810349
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: linux-patch-grsecurity2
Severity: important
Hi,
I'm reporting against linux-patch-grsecurity2 package but actually I
think it should be reassigned to ftp.debian.org soon. This package is
severely obsolete, and is somehow deprecated by the fact that a
linux-grsec source package now exists, and builds binaries for i386 and
amd64 (with more architectures certainly possible).
I can certainly let you request the removal, or will handle it myself at
one point, unless you really want to keep it and have it updated.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (500,
'oldstable'), (450, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 4.3.0-1-grsec-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 8:28 PM, László Böszörményi (GCS) <[email protected]>
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Yves-Alexis Perez <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Not really, but at least for the initial intent of this bug, yes: you want to
>> keep the package in the archive :)
> I do. Lowering the severity for now.
Actually close the bug as I'd like to keep this package. I plan to
keep it up-to-date of course.
Laszlo/GCS
--- End Message ---
