Your message dated Tue, 14 Feb 2017 00:16:56 +0530
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#854671: Feed back some of the current Ubuntu multipath 
delta
has caused the Debian Bug report #854671,
regarding Feed back some of the current Ubuntu multipath delta
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
854671: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=854671
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: multipath-tools
Version: 0.6.4-3
Severity: normal

Hi,
I was working on the latest merge of multipath-tools into Ubuntu.
There is a lot of cruft that I have to sort out in detail once I find some
more time - a lot of it might be outdated. Some other parts are for early
boot/install multipath - those might be useful to Debian, but those are not
from me so I have a hard time sorting out what really is still needed.

Never the less there are a few changes which I think would already help
Debian today and can be applied. I ported those onto latest master of [1].

You can find the commits at [2], the TL;DR overview are:
-  debian/control: Bump to an updated udev dependency
- d/multipath-tools.preinst: modprobe dm-multipath
- add dep8 test for kpartx
- add dep8 test using tgt and open-iscsi

I'd be happy if you'd consider those changes to be integrated in the next
Debian upload and I'm totally open for discussion if needed.

[1]: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-lvm/multipath-tools.git
[2]:
https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+git/multipath-tools/+ref/zesty-submit-delta

-- 
Christian Ehrhardt
Software Engineer, Ubuntu Server
Canonical Ltd

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On Mon, 2017-02-13 at 12:59 +0100, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Why do we need a modprobe when the systemd service does load the module ?
> > 
> > For the SysV initscript, it is missing from the multipath-tools package but
> > is
> > available in the m-t-boot package.
> 
> I beg a pardon, you are right.
> The "ExecStartPre=/sbin/modprobe dm-multipath" covers now in the systemd case.
> 

Thanks for clarifying.

> The split in between the packages, especially for the -boot cases was
> different in the past for Ubuntu.
> Maybe that is the reason this got added in the past, but you are right this
> change is not needed anymore.
> 
> But even that extra split might these days no more be needed - as I said I'm
> convinced more cleanup on
> our side could be done, but I had no time this merge to do so.
> 
> What do you think on the other minor deltas I submitted in this series?

I've merged the other 3 changes. Thanks.


- -- 
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs
Debian - The Universal Operating System
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=Yg3h
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to