Your message dated Tue, 16 May 2017 11:06:48 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#862724: [libjasper] New upstream on GitHub
has caused the Debian Bug report #862724,
regarding [libjasper] New upstream on GitHub
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
862724: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=862724
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libjasper
Severity: normal
Hello,
It seems someone took over upstream maintenance on GitHub:
https://github.com/mdadams/jasper
They also switched to CMake build system. I really think this package
should be updated as it adds support for JPEG 2000 files on OpenCV.
I made a quick n dirty update here, feel free to consider my changes as
being public domain if interested in:
https://cloud.le-vert.net/index.php/s/2Ci3X1ARrZiONK4
Regards, Adam.
--- System information. ---
Architecture: amd64
Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64
Debian Release: 8.8
500 stable-updates ftp.fr.debian.org
500 stable security.debian.org
500 stable ftp.fr.debian.org
500 stable dl.google.com
500 jessie repos.mesosphere.io
500 jessie packages.hitec.lu
1001 wheezy-cdh5 archive.cloudera.com
100 jessie-backports ftp.fr.debian.org
--- Package information. ---
Package's Depends field is empty.
Package's Recommends field is empty.
Package's Suggests field is empty.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 10:47:57AM +0200, Adam Cecile wrote:
> Package: libjasper
> Severity: normal
>
> Hello,
>
> It seems someone took over upstream maintenance on GitHub:
> https://github.com/mdadams/jasper
Interesting.
Though that's too late for us. Now the package is already gone from the
archive, so it's going to need somebody to package AND maintain it in
the archive.
You could probably file a RFP bug for it (filing a bug againt a package
that is not in the archive anymore is not how you request a new package
to be introduced).
https://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/#tag-rfp
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
