Your message dated Wed, 1 Mar 2006 19:57:23 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#347630: libsysfs transition next Wednesday
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libcpufreq0
Version: 0.4-1
Tags: patch
Hi!
sysfsutils version 2.0.0 is out for a while now, and packages are
available in Debian experimental. This version brings a new SONAME of
libsysfs; the API was cleaned up considerably for consistency, and
some convenience functions were dropped.
directfb needs some tweaks to work with 2.0. I prepared a patch at
http://patches.ubuntu.com/patches/cpufrequtils.libsysfs2.diff
which makes this package work with libsysfs2. Can you please test
this, pass it to upstream, and prepare a new package?
I will upload sysfsutils 2.0 to unstable in about two weeks, unless
major problems arise.
Thanks!
Martin
--
Martin Pitt http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com
Debian Developer http://www.debian.org
In a world without walls and fences, who needs Windows and Gates?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 12:44:18PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> Martin Pitt [2006-02-11 11:53 +0100]:
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > Some weeks have passed after the initial announcement of libsysfs2,
> > and I didn't hear about any problems so far.
libcpufreq0=0.4-1+b3 has been rebuilt against libsysfs2.
Thanks
--
mattia
:wq!
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
