Your message dated Fri, 23 Jun 2017 13:04:26 +0200 with message-id <[email protected]> and subject line Re: Bug#422882: openssl: mistake in note on x509v3_config manual page has caused the Debian Bug report #422882, regarding openssl: mistake in note on x509v3_config manual page to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) -- 422882: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=422882 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: openssl Version: 0.9.8e-4 Severity: normal Tags: patch at NOTE section on x509v3_config manual page says: If an extension is multi-value and a field value must contain a comma the long form must be used otherwise the comma would be misinterpreted as a field separator. For example: subjectAltName=URI:ldap://somehost.com/CN=foo,OU=bar will produce an error but the equivalent form: subjectAltName=@subject_alt_section [subject_alt_section] subjectAltName=URI:ldap://somehost.com/CN=foo,OU=bar is valid. I had to change my openssl.cnf file to samething as: [v3_req] ... crlDistributionPoints = @crl_section [crl_section] URI=ldap://xxx.com/cn=XXX,ou=XXX,o=XXX,c=XXX Original note doesn't work for me. Regards -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-xen-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=es_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages openssl depends on: ii libc6 2.5-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libssl0.9.8 0.9.8e-4 SSL shared libraries ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-13 compression library - runtime openssl recommends no packages. -- debconf-show failed
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Version: 1.1.0c-1 On 2017-01-07 14:27:05 [+0100], Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > Does this still apply? As of 1.1.0c it seems to work with the former > example and fails with the latter. Closing. No response and it seems to fixed in 1.1.0c Sebastian
--- End Message ---
