Your message dated Fri, 23 Jun 2017 20:32:53 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#815089: Info received (Bug#815089:
libimage-exiftool-perl: extract timestamp hash/algo of signed+timestamped PDF)
has caused the Debian Bug report #815089,
regarding libimage-exiftool-perl: extract timestamp hash/algo of
signed+timestamped PDF
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
815089: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=815089
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libimage-exiftool-perl
Version: 10.10-1
Severity: wishlist
would love to see this
extract timestamp hash/algo of signed+timestamped PDF
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers testing-updates
APT policy: (500, 'testing-updates'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 4.3.0-1-amd64
Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
Versions of packages libimage-exiftool-perl depends on:
ii perl 5.22.1-7
Versions of packages libimage-exiftool-perl recommends:
ii libarchive-zip-perl 1.56-2
libimage-exiftool-perl suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 08:12:51 -0500, Phil Harvey wrote:
> Well, if the DigestValue isn't changing, then it definitely isn't doing what
> you want.
>
> My best guess is that the information you want is embedded in the
> value of the V Contents. This value is about 17 kB in size, and
> looks like it contains a lot of interesting stuff. However, I think
> it may be a fair amount of work to decode this, and I don't know if
> it is worth the effort. I have looked at the digital signature part
> of the PDF documentation, and it references some RFC's that are
> very hard to follow.
Thanks Phil.
I'm closing this bug as there is no fix in sight.
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at/ - Debian Developer https://www.debian.org
: :' : OpenPGP fingerprint D1E1 316E 93A7 60A8 104D 85FA BB3A 6801 8649 AA06
`. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
`- NP: Van Morrison
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature
--- End Message ---
