Your message dated Tue, 4 Jul 2017 20:28:51 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#860492: mgen-doc: please drop recommends on dhelp,
which is RC-buggy and not going into Stretch
has caused the Debian Bug report #860492,
regarding mgen-doc: please drop recommends on dhelp, which is RC-buggy and not
going into Stretch
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
860492: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=860492
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: mgen-doc
Version: 5.02.b+dfsg1-2
Severity: important
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
While going through RC bugs of packages maintained by QA, I noticed that
mgen-doc alternatively Recommends dhelp. dhelp is RC-buggy¹ and not going to
make it into Stretch.
I am probably going to requist removal of dhelp if nobody is going to step up
for maintenance. I suggest you drop the Recommends from mgen-doc. I am not sure
if this in itself is RC, but I think it is just not, hence the severity.
¹ https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=791770
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.0
APT prefers testing-debug
APT policy: (500, 'testing-debug'), (500, 'testing'), (200, 'experimental'),
(200, 'testing'), (50, 'experimental'), (50, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEWLZtSHNr6TsFLeZynFyZ6wW9dQoFAlj1GGAACgkQnFyZ6wW9
dQrRLggAnKDm+T2ReW02SwwiYileTR52Srn4A18afJSIZQKYuAS8QM8riYYeqaNN
M10tDIlLAJ3o8K4hxPqocwixZDMjio6EYpD3DxB6nAhDKotJLMcg2kQUz+t9i8Yl
RhgT/zuq4hPVNOEqLEtQ9Mnv+IaRIvBn97BJmtp66VFzy/t5AYp/iiHsIg7QNX8p
MbtPhMNHV804dHHa2/ZkYCS+Jwzfq45BjYua2WHArF6Ic/C/fs2x8G8brm7z7QXq
XeuYeg/wPZAdOWN7OWxQy6eomfZjjK1BLlDpCrmu3EWHZmJP1nLTJDf/2/512Y3G
R1aGt1odnipJ4oWRm75PL3t2Ju6Leg==
=TeAH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Raoul,
On 01-07-17 10:41, Raoul Gunnar Borenius wrote:
> The mentioned bug seems to be fixed and dhelp is still in the
> archive. I guess I can leave everything unchanged and just close the
> bug?
Indeed.
Done so now for you.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
