Your message dated Tue, 22 Aug 2017 16:55:47 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: package description unclear about API breaking version
numbers
has caused the Debian Bug report #872187,
regarding package description unclear about API breaking version numbers
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
872187: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=872187
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: borgbackup
Version: 1.0.11-3
Severity: normal
Please note that the server and the client should be on the same
version of borgbackup. Using different versions of borgbackup on
client and server might result in 'incompatible API version' error
messages and a non-working backup.
Could this happen between any two versions even if only the minor
version changed? It's not clear. I found this in the documentation:
EXPECT THAT WE WILL BREAK COMPATIBILITY REPEATEDLY WHEN MAJOR RELEASE
NUMBER CHANGES (like when going from 0.x.y to 1.0.0 or from 1.x.y to 2.0.0).
Which seems to suggest that the API version change would only affect
major version number changes, but I'm not clear if it's talking about
the same kind of API mismatch.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 4.11.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8),
LANGUAGE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, 19 Aug 2017 12:54:38 +0200 Marian Beermann <[email protected]> wrote:
> All 1.x servers and clients are compatible with each other.
thanks, I'm inclined to close this bug report,
we already discussed this a lot of times and the current description seems
already
correct if I read it correctly
G.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
