Your message dated Fri, 01 Sep 2017 17:19:54 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: [Pkg-swan-devel] Bug#872120: strongswan: fdisk
build-dependency needed (for tests)
has caused the Debian Bug report #872120,
regarding strongswan: fdisk build-dependency needed (for tests)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
872120: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=872120
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: strongswan
Version: 5.5.3-2
Severity: important
User: [email protected]
Usertags: fdisk-build-dependency
Hello,
As recently announced on debian-devel-announce[1] packages who need
any of sfdisk, cfdisk or fdisk will need to add a dependency on the
new fdisk package.
Your package strongswan showed up on codesearch.debian.net and a very
quick analysis suggested you might want to add a build-dependency as
your package only seems to use things from the fdisk package in its
test-suite.
Please use the backwards-compatible way of specifying the
build-dependency as suggested in the debian-devel-announce mail:
fdisk <!nocheck> | util-linux (<< 2.29.2-3~) <!nocheck>
If your more detailed analysis shows this should not be needed then
please just close this bug report stating the results of your
analysis (and if so sorry for bothering you).
Regards, Andreas Henriksson
[1]:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2017/08/msg00005.html
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, 2017-08-14 at 15:52 +0200, [email protected] wrote:
> Your package strongswan showed up on codesearch.debian.net and a very
> quick analysis suggested you might want to add a build-dependency as
> your package only seems to use things from the fdisk package in its
> test-suite.
Hi,
this test-suite is not run during standard builds. In case we add it at that
point, we'll add the dependency. Tanks for the bug though.
>
> Please use the backwards-compatible way of specifying the
> build-dependency as suggested in the debian-devel-announce mail:
>
> fdisk <!nocheck> | util-linux (<< 2.29.2-3~) <!nocheck>
>
> If your more detailed analysis shows this should not be needed then
> please just close this bug report stating the results of your
> analysis (and if so sorry for bothering you).
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
