Your message dated Sun, 03 Sep 2017 18:14:09 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#872563: apparmor: Enigmail doesn't find gpg
has caused the Debian Bug report #872563,
regarding apparmor: Enigmail doesn't find gpg
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
872563: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=872563
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: apparmor
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
after activating apparmor according wiki.debian.org enigmail wasn't able to
find either /usr/bin/gpg or /usr/bin/gpg2.
It worked after removing apparmor and restarting.
Best regards,
Martin
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.1
APT prefers proposed-updates
APT policy: (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 4.11.0-0.bpo.1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8),
LANGUAGE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
Versions of packages apparmor depends on:
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.61
ii init-system-helpers 1.48
pn libapparmor-perl <none>
ii libc6 2.24-11+deb9u1
ii lsb-base 9.20161125
ii python3 3.5.3-1
apparmor recommends no packages.
Versions of packages apparmor suggests:
pn apparmor-profiles <none>
pn apparmor-profiles-extra <none>
pn apparmor-utils <none>
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
Martin Dosch:
> intrigeri:
>> Thanks for testing! So: case closed, right?
> At least for thunderbird.
OK, closing this bug report then.
> Now I have to investigate who is the culprit, firejail or apparmor...
I suspect each of these systems works fine independently, but nobody
worked on making them work together.
I have no plan to work on that personally (the way I see it, the
Portals concept is what will make GUI sandboxing nice in the future,
so I'm rather looking at Flatpak & Snap). If you want to tackle this
problem yourself, great! The upstream / cross-distro AppArmor mailing
list is <[email protected]>. Please discuss issues and
whatever topic needs discussion there, as making firejail work with
AppArmor is not specific to Debian.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
--- End Message ---
