Your message dated Thu, 21 Dec 2017 21:43:24 +0100
with message-id <be830e94-0caa-4c0c-c159-0d2ca6dec...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#884804: nmu: cacti_1.1.28+ds1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #884804,
regarding nmu: cacti_1.1.28+ds1-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
884804: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=884804
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Cacti uses dh_linktree to manage several embedded JavaScript packages. Until
bug 783906¹ is fixed, dh_linktree adds a strict version dependency on the
packages it links from. I am considering to implement something else in Cacti
while waiting for dh_linktree to get fixed (or help get dh_linktree fixed), but
in the mean time, to fix RC bug 884756² in Cacti, I request a binNMU.
nmu cacti_1.1.28+ds1-2 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild cacti for new version of
libjs-jquery-colorpicker"
¹ https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=783906
² https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=884756
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
APT prefers testing-debug
APT policy: (500, 'testing-debug'), (500, 'testing'), (200, 'testing'), (50,
'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 4.13.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8),
LANGUAGE=en_US:en (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEWLZtSHNr6TsFLeZynFyZ6wW9dQoFAlo5gNgACgkQnFyZ6wW9
dQqSkgf/eYIYFM9YLFXiEpX+nKKk2gzthBhzC3+dwyeCjXV4Cos3b9570RAY7Lpf
JrFKJWAyp1IoVKLDZxhvSRWv1ziqmKWClQtZzEaOP/STrBw9y49TPcAse1U5d5f0
l/o6Opyn7d6MN2bnbVt5iK63pFi2crnYd7znhbd+E5HphBv8hAARp5JpKd6jRHGC
DZtSeSEieq/5+B+zVt7wylk43r4CXVQnhzeeBaKs4slyOSHpaR8/NXU0H9Myi/Lz
Wh1ewhbNXp3bjxuweHBDuskNhs6OqYN2BgovQLu9bTUpBHgBIdnt09mB/Qo8RSxk
feSo7FMwDmoegM72YcCx+RQalwOzkw==
=fOBJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
Abort this request. I just did a sourceful upload to achieve the same think.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
