Your message dated Sun, 19 Mar 2006 18:23:16 +0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line etl: 354069: etl-dev is fine
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: etl-dev
Version: 0.04.07-2
etl-dev does not follow the policy. It should be name libetl-dev because
it is a library, even though it is only .h
Hub
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Steve Langasek had this to say[1], so closing the bug:
> The name "etl-dev" is fine. Prepending "lib" when there's nothing
> here named libetl is pointless.
1. http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2006/03/msg00295.html
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
