Your message dated Sun, 8 Apr 2018 17:51:37 +0200
with message-id <6919fb04-b600-3372-abec-3cc829e24...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: /usr/bin/nm-applet: nm-applet: CRITICAL **: 
nm_secret_agent_register: assertion 'priv->registered == FALSE' failed
has caused the Debian Bug report #745811,
regarding /usr/bin/nm-applet: nm-applet: CRITICAL **: nm_secret_agent_register: 
assertion 'priv->registered == FALSE' failed
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
745811: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=745811
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: network-manager-gnome
Version: 0.9.8.8-5
Severity: normal
File: /usr/bin/nm-applet

Dear Maintainer,

With Debian Jessie and XFCE, nm-applet reports:

** (nm-applet:3534): CRITICAL **: nm_secret_agent_register: assertion
'priv->registered == FALSE' failed

Bug already upstream: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=727923

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers testing-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'testing-updates'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.13-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages network-manager-gnome depends on:
ii  dbus-x11                                     1.8.0-3
ii  dconf-gsettings-backend [gsettings-backend]  0.18.0-1
ii  gconf-service                                3.2.6-2
ii  gnome-icon-theme                             3.12.0-1
ii  libatk1.0-0                                  2.12.0-1
ii  libc6                                        2.18-4
ii  libcairo-gobject2                            1.12.16-2
ii  libcairo2                                    1.12.16-2
ii  libdbus-1-3                                  1.8.0-3
ii  libdbus-glib-1-2                             0.102-1
ii  libgconf-2-4                                 3.2.6-2
ii  libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0                           2.30.6-1
ii  libglib2.0-0                                 2.40.0-2
ii  libgnome-bluetooth11                         3.8.1-2
ii  libgnome-keyring0                            3.4.1-1
ii  libgtk-3-0                                   3.12.0-4
ii  libmm-glib0                                  1.0.0-4
ii  libnm-glib-vpn1                              0.9.8.8-7
ii  libnm-glib4                                  0.9.8.8-7
ii  libnm-gtk0                                   0.9.8.8-5
ii  libnm-util2                                  0.9.8.8-7
ii  libnotify4                                   0.7.6-2
ii  libpango-1.0-0                               1.36.3-1
ii  libpangocairo-1.0-0                          1.36.3-1
ii  libsecret-1-0                                0.18-1
ii  network-manager                              0.9.8.8-7
ii  policykit-1-gnome                            0.105-2

Versions of packages network-manager-gnome recommends:
ii  gnome-bluetooth                      3.8.1-2
ii  gnome-keyring                        3.8.2-2+b1
ii  iso-codes                            3.52-1
ii  mobile-broadband-provider-info       20140317-1
ii  notification-daemon                  0.7.6-1
ii  xfce4-notifyd [notification-daemon]  0.2.4-2

Versions of packages network-manager-gnome suggests:
pn  network-manager-openconnect-gnome  <none>
pn  network-manager-openvpn-gnome      <none>
pn  network-manager-pptp-gnome         <none>
pn  network-manager-vpnc-gnome         <none>

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.0.0-1

This is supposed to be fixed by a new upstream release.
Thus closing this bug report.

Regards,
Michael

-- 
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to