Your message dated Sat, 12 May 2018 23:43:14 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#850921: why do we still have openjfx-java version 8 in
unstable ?
has caused the Debian Bug report #850921,
regarding openjfx version for openjdk 9.0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
850921: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=850921
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: openjfx
Version: 8u111-b14-1
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
openjfx stamps out at 8u111-b14-1
> aptitude show openjfx
Package: openjfx
Version: 8u111-b14-1
State: installed
Automatically installed: no
Priority: optional
Section: java
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers
<[email protected]>
Architecture: amd64
Uncompressed Size: 74.8 k
Depends: libopenjfx-java, openjdk-8-jre
Description: JavaFX/OpenJFX 8 - Rich client application platform for Java
JavaFX/OpenJFX is a set of graphics and media APIs that enables Java
developers to design, create, test, debug, and deploy rich client
applications that operate consistently across diverse platforms.
Homepage: http://openjdk.java.net/projects/openjfx/
whereas openjdk has version 9 as well -
> java -version
openjdk version "9-Debian"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 9-Debian+0-9b151-2)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 9-Debian+0-9b151-2, mixed mode)
> apt-cache policy openjdk-9-jre
openjdk-9-jre:
Installed: 9~b151-2
Candidate: 9~b151-2
Version table:
*** 9~b151-2 100
100 http://httpredir.debian.org/debian unstable/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
Looking forward to see the package which works with version 9.
While openjdk 9 would be available around the middle of the year from
http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk9/
If openjdk 9 is being provided in sid to test out things, it makes
sense to also provide openjfx for that as well.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (100, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 4.8.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_IN.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_IN.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
(ignored: LC_ALL set to en_IN.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
Versions of packages openjfx depends on:
ii libopenjfx-java 8u111-b14-1
ii openjdk-9-jre 9~b151-2
openjfx recommends no packages.
openjfx suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
Regards,
Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल
My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com
EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A 2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Shirish,
It's preferable to ask your questions about the openjfx package on the
Java mailing list ([email protected]).
> Is that the plan ?
Yes, I'll upgrade the openjfx package once we switch to OpenJDK 11 as
the default Java runtime.
Emmanuel Bourg
--- End Message ---
