Your message dated Sun, 26 Mar 2006 22:37:23 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#359133: sa-exim: Logs rejects in mainlog
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sa-exim
Version: 4.2-2
Severity: minor
Hi
Sa-exim logs rejects to /var/log/exim4/mainlog (SAEximDebug: 0), shouldn't they
be in
/var/log/exim4/rejectlog?
Markus
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages sa-exim depends on:
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.30.13 Debian configuration management sy
ii exim4-daemon-heavy 4.50-8 exim MTA (v4) daemon with extended
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii spamc 3.1.0a-1bpo1 Client for SpamAssassin spam filte
-- debconf information excluded
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
> Sa-exim logs rejects to /var/log/exim4/mainlog (SAEximDebug: 0),
> shouldn't they be in /var/log/exim4/rejectlog?
Exim itself logs rejects to mainlog too. SA-Exim is in fact part of Exim
when installed and therefore uses the same way of logging.
I hope above stated is clear enough, so i'm closing this bug.
Regards,
Sander.
--
| My mind not only wanders, it sometimes leaves completely.
| 1024D/08CEC94D - 34B3 3314 B146 E13C 70C8 9BDB D463 7E41 08CE C94D
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
