Your message dated Mon, 27 Mar 2006 09:23:58 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line nfs trouble with kernel 2.6.0-test2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: nfs-kernel-server
Version: 1.0.5 (not installed)
Severity: serious
Hi Chip,
I was bitten by the "connection refused" bugs in the previous nfsd
packages, and it got fixed with 1.0.5. I was using test1 at that time.
I recently compiled test2, and the problem appeared again, same
symptoms, etc.
Going back to 1.0.3-1 fixed the problem for me again.
Might be a kernel bug, but filing against nfs-kernel-server as we've had
the same problem very recently.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux nubol 2.6.0-test2 #1 Sun Jul 27 21:12:02 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Steinar!
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 03:24:35AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> This bug is three years old now, and I'd guess it's no longer relevant.
> Jordi, are you still seeing this? If not, would you please close it?
Heh, that was a nice bug log read. I didn't remember about this at all!
I guess this is either fixed, or nobody is using mixes of 2.6 and 2.4
like at the time of 2.6.0.
I'm happy to close this.
Jordi
--
Jordi Mallach Pérez -- Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
