Your message dated Fri, 26 Oct 2018 21:45:42 +1300
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#772776: questionable /etc/nsd/nsd.conf.d
has caused the Debian Bug report #772776,
regarding questionable /etc/nsd/nsd.conf.d
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
772776: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=772776
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: nsd
Version: 4.1.0-2
Severity: normal

/etc/nsd/nsd.conf is misleading I think.

First of all, wilcard includes work, and the manpage also says so.
The comment preceeding the disabled include nsd.conf.d/*.conf line
is thus misleading.

Second, nsd does not merge server: stanzas. If you provide two files
with settings inside server:, you get an error:

  nsd[22432]: /etc/nsd/nsd.conf.d/local-verbosity.conf:1: error: duplicate 
server: element.

Ideally, this would be fixed upstream such that server:
configuration in included files are merged appropriately. Until this
is the case, however, I think that /etc/nsd/nsd.conf.d should not be
provided or used.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.17-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_NZ, LC_CTYPE=en_NZ.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft <[email protected]> @martinkrafft
: :'  :  proud Debian developer
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems

Attachment: digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
also sprach Markus Schade <[email protected]> [2018-10-26 21:20 +1300]:
> If you don't object, I would close this bug report as fixed or at
> downgrade it to wishlist.

Closed. Of course conf.d is better! Glad this is fixed.

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft <[email protected]> @martinkrafft
: :'  :  proud Debian developer
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems

Attachment: digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital GPG signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to