Your message dated Tue, 04 Dec 2018 11:57:30 +0000 with message-id <[email protected]> and subject line Bug#915422: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #522320, regarding cl-lexer: Mysterious fault triggered by number of rules to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) -- 522320: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=522320 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: cl-lexer Version: 1-4 Severity: normal I am attempting to use cl-lexer/cl-yacc to realize the syntax of DMTF's CIM information model - the one that is used to define MOF files for the DMTF data model. This is just to inform you that the lex rules in the example are not arbitrary - they are part of a real-life project. I observe a mysterious problem; when I tried to reduce the input to this bug report I ended up with a 10-rule lexer that works like a charm, while an 11-rule lexer fails in an area that is completely unrelated to the failure. First the failure: CL-USER> (lexer:deflexer test-lexer ("[+-]?[01][01]*[bB]" (return (values 'binaryValue lexer:%0))) ("[+-]?0[xX][0-9a-fA-F][0-9a-fA-F]*" (return (values 'hexValue lexer:%0))) ("[+-]?[0-9]*[.][0-9][0-9]*" (return (values 'flt lexer:%0))) ("[+-]?0[0-7][0-7]*" (return (values 'octalValue lexer:%0))) ("[1-9][0-9]*" (return (values 'positive lexer:%0))) ("[+-]?[0-9][0-9]*" (return (values 'decimal lexer:%0))) ("[:alpha:][:alnum:]*" (return (values 'name lexer:%0))) ("any" (return (values 'ANY lexer:%0))) ("as" (return (values 'AS lexer:%0))) ("association" (return (values 'ASSOCIATION lexer:%0))) ("[:space:]+") ) TEST-LEXER CL-USER> (defparameter lex (test-lexer "1.0")) LEX CL-USER> (funcall lex) POSITIVE "1" This response is wrong: the text "1.0" should match the 3rd rule, not the 5th. If I remove a single rule (the 10th) from the lexer, it works correctly: CL-USER> (lexer:deflexer test-lexer ("[+-]?[01][01]*[bB]" (return (values 'binaryValue lexer:%0))) ("[+-]?0[xX][0-9a-fA-F][0-9a-fA-F]*" (return (values 'hexValue lexer:%0))) ("[+-]?[0-9]*[.][0-9][0-9]*" (return (values 'flt lexer:%0))) ("[+-]?0[0-7][0-7]*" (return (values 'octalValue lexer:%0))) ("[1-9][0-9]*" (return (values 'positive lexer:%0))) ("[+-]?[0-9][0-9]*" (return (values 'decimal lexer:%0))) ("[:alpha:][:alnum:]*" (return (values 'name lexer:%0))) ("any" (return (values 'ANY lexer:%0))) ("as" (return (values 'AS lexer:%0))) ("[:space:]+") ) STYLE-WARNING: redefining TEST-LEXER in DEFUN TEST-LEXER CL-USER> (defparameter lex (test-lexer "1.0")) LEX CL-USER> (funcall lex) FLT "1.0" At a guess, I would say that this is a problem with the underlying cl-regex, not with cl-lexer itself. I will continue along this path if I can find the time. But I thought I would throw this piece of intelligence to the BTS, in the hope that someone with more insight in the two packages can tell me what happens. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.28-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_DK.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_DK.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages cl-lexer depends on: ii cl-regex 1-3 Common Lisp regular expression com ii common-lisp-controller 6.17 Common Lisp source and compiler ma cl-lexer recommends no packages. cl-lexer suggests no packages. -- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Version: 1-5+rm Dear submitter, as the package cl-lexer has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/915422 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [email protected]. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
--- End Message ---
