Your message dated Sun, 20 Jan 2019 18:59:42 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#919894: RM: rng-tools-debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #919894,
regarding RM: rng-tools-debian
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
919894: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=919894
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ftp.debian.org
This package was uploaded as part of a series of uncoordinated changes
to various rng-tools packages. It would be best that it not enter a
stable release, and it isn't clear that the package is needed at all. I
can't find an ITP dicussing this package or how it should be coordinated
with the other rng-tools packages currently in the archive.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Instead of leaping straight to filing an rm bug on a package you don't
maintain, I think it would be better to file an RC bug against the package
explaining your concerns. Before doing an rm like this some communication with
the maintainers is appropriate.
Scott t
On January 20, 2019 3:29:24 PM UTC, Michael Stone <[email protected]> wrote:
>Package: ftp.debian.org
>
>This package was uploaded as part of a series of uncoordinated changes
>to various rng-tools packages. It would be best that it not enter a
>stable release, and it isn't clear that the package is needed at all. I
>
>can't find an ITP dicussing this package or how it should be
>coordinated
>with the other rng-tools packages currently in the archive.
--- End Message ---
