Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 12:58:25 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#567102: Get acl installed and usable by default
has caused the Debian Bug report #567102,
regarding Get acl installed and usable by default
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
567102: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=567102
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: acl
Version: 2.2.49-1
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
Could FS ACLs be enabled (acl package installed, acl option in fstab) by
default (right after standard Debian install))?
"chmod 777 uploads" is easy, but is not the proper way.
POSIX access control isn't enough anymore (IMO), so it would be nice to have
ACLs available when necessary.
Greetings,
Olaf
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages acl depends on:
ii libacl1 2.2.49-1 Access control list shared library
ii libattr1 1:2.4.44-1 Extended attribute shared library
ii libc6 2.10.2-2 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
acl recommends no packages.
acl suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi!
On Sat, 2011-05-28 at 15:06:10 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> > Could FS ACLs be enabled (acl package installed, acl option in fstab)
> by default (right after standard Debian install))?
>
> This seem to me to be two questions:
>
> - whether acl should be in the base system (question for debian-devel?)
>
> - whether debian-installer should by default add the acl option to
> /etc/fstab for filesystems that need it (question for debian-boot?) or
> whether the acl option should be default for the filesystems that need
> it (bugs to the respective filesystem mount.x providing packages?)
>
> Can you please mention your request to one or more of the above
> mentioned fora that you think match best?
I agree that this report is not actionable from the acl source package
PoV. So I'm closing it. If there is interest in pursuing any of these
(again), please rise them in the apropriate fora first.
Thanks,
Guillem
--- End Message ---
