Your message dated Wed, 19 Apr 2006 18:10:02 -0700 (PDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing as redundant
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: parted
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
Attached patch for libparted, courtesy of Fabio Massimo Di Nitto,
enables the support for RAID volumes on sparc. I'd appreciate if it would
find its way into the libparted, as it would make it possible to install
to RAID volumes on sparc.
Best regards,
Jurij Smakov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/ KeyID: C99E03CC
#! /bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run
## sparc-fix-raid.dpatch by <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
##
## All lines beginning with `## DP:' are a description of the patch.
## DP: No description.
@DPATCH@
diff -urNad parted-1.6.25.1~/libparted/disk_sun.c
parted-1.6.25.1/libparted/disk_sun.c
--- parted-1.6.25.1~/libparted/disk_sun.c 2006-04-16 07:18:49.000000000
+0200
+++ parted-1.6.25.1/libparted/disk_sun.c 2006-04-16 07:19:22.000000000
+0200
@@ -82,6 +82,7 @@
int is_boot;
int is_root;
int is_lvm;
+ int is_raid;
} SunPartitionData;
typedef struct {
@@ -342,6 +343,7 @@
sun_data->is_boot = sun_data->type == 0x1;
sun_data->is_root = sun_data->type == 0x2;
sun_data->is_lvm = sun_data->type == 0x8e;
+ sun_data->is_raid = sun_data->type == 0xfd;
part->num = i + 1;
part->fs_type = ped_file_system_probe (&part->geom);
@@ -477,6 +479,7 @@
sun_data->is_boot = 0;
sun_data->is_root = 0;
sun_data->is_lvm = 0;
+ sun_data->is_raid = 0;
} else {
part->disk_specific = NULL;
}
@@ -511,6 +514,7 @@
new_sun_data->is_boot = old_sun_data->is_boot;
new_sun_data->is_root = old_sun_data->is_root;
new_sun_data->is_lvm = old_sun_data->is_lvm;
+ new_sun_data->is_raid = old_sun_data->is_raid;
return new_part;
}
@@ -543,6 +547,10 @@
sun_data->type = 0x8e;
return 1;
}
+ if (sun_data->is_raid) {
+ sun_data->type = 0xfd;
+ return 1;
+ }
sun_data->type = 0x83;
if (fs_type) {
@@ -570,19 +578,25 @@
case PED_PARTITION_BOOT:
sun_data->is_boot = state;
if (state)
- sun_data->is_root = sun_data->is_lvm = 0;
+ sun_data->is_root = sun_data->is_lvm =
sun_data->is_raid = 0;
return ped_partition_set_system (part, part->fs_type);
case PED_PARTITION_ROOT:
sun_data->is_root = state;
if (state)
- sun_data->is_boot = sun_data->is_lvm = 0;
+ sun_data->is_boot = sun_data->is_lvm =
sun_data->is_raid = 0;
return ped_partition_set_system (part, part->fs_type);
case PED_PARTITION_LVM:
sun_data->is_lvm = state;
if (state)
- sun_data->is_root = sun_data->is_boot = 0;
+ sun_data->is_root = sun_data->is_boot =
sun_data->is_raid = 0;
+ return ped_partition_set_system (part, part->fs_type);
+
+ case PED_PARTITION_RAID:
+ sun_data->is_raid = state;
+ if (state)
+ sun_data->is_root = sun_data->is_boot =
sun_data->is_lvm = 0;
return ped_partition_set_system (part, part->fs_type);
default:
@@ -608,6 +622,8 @@
return sun_data->is_root;
case PED_PARTITION_LVM:
return sun_data->is_lvm;
+ case PED_PARTITION_RAID:
+ return sun_data->is_raid;
default:
return 0;
@@ -623,6 +639,7 @@
case PED_PARTITION_BOOT:
case PED_PARTITION_ROOT:
case PED_PARTITION_LVM:
+ case PED_PARTITION_RAID:
return 1;
default:
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
The patch mentioned in this bug has been attached to the older bug 355467,
so I'm closing this one as redundant.
Best regards,
Jurij Smakov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/ KeyID: C99E03CC
--- End Message ---
