Your message dated Wed, 26 Apr 2006 10:55:01 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#352400: rsnapshot: does not start ("Can't locate
Antiflux/Rename.pm in @INC")
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: rsnapshot
Version: 1.2.1-1
Severity: important
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
rsnapshot does not start due to missing Antiflux/Rename.pm:
$ sudo rsnapshot daily
Can't locate Antiflux/Rename.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/local/perl
/etc/perl /usr/local/lib/perl/5.8.8 /usr/local/share/perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5
/usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.8 /usr/share/perl/5.8 /usr/local/lib/site_perl
.) at /usr/bin/rsnapshot line 5.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/bin/rsnapshot line 5.
Did not find anything with google.
Ciao, Gregor
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15.4
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Versions of packages rsnapshot depends on:
ii logrotate 3.7.1-2 Log rotation utility
ii perl 5.8.8-2 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
ii rsync 2.6.6-1 fast remote file copy program (lik
Versions of packages rsnapshot recommends:
ii ssh 1:4.2p1-5 Secure shell client and server (tr
- -- no debconf information
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iQETAwUBQ+4gHEsbarOtuQIpAQpIuwfuNouYjMsUnD8bk99YYrYFUOw6pYawSXHK
ch+X4exV/wz2npiua3RWYPeOWBnX7kFu5ZJiyxCDH/df3bZweJ/1IswFUU0QfCWz
a+00jZa+KawGOs56CMoTO8ebecS/XHMYcGDTug+a2syqZH6JFBxFyzhqsbpTJl7r
IazSqRwEwmK4Lrut/YVtgT1j9AoiU15koHqfwWcVPJNFhiAbRcTlIdX01dMSwg2M
ByCvt26KunF6K7WrBsuYrQufJMXBS/KTzRmWvvoeIatzTYksC/Ua1FIGbRwyq9Pj
SPCwGNoVadjt5JV/cGSvdLMBaFlY6iBaw3euWlnxw7EWjsQiRNU=
=oNhd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Gregor Zattler wrote:
>
> I investigated a bit: There was a "local diversion" (never heard
> of such thing before).
Diversions allows you to protect files from being overwritten by dpkg
when it extracts newly installed packages. For example say you manually
modified /usr/bin/rsnapshot and you don't want dpkg to overwrite it when
you "apt-get install rsnapshot", you can instruct dpkg-divert like this:
# dpkg-divert --add /usr/bin/rsnapshot
Adding `local diversion of /usr/bin/rsnapshot to /usr/bin/rsnapshot.distrib'
You can get a list of current diversions on your system using
"dpkg-divert --list" .
>
> I have no idea where this local diversion came from. First time
> i installed rsnapshot it was from sources, i belive. Then there
> was a debian package somewhere. Later there was a package in the
> main debian repository. Perhaps it's from the earlier debian
> package?
Maybe the first unofficial Debian package you installed required
Antiflux::Rename and did the diversion for you.
Regards,
Simon
--- End Message ---
