Your message dated Thu, 9 Jan 2020 09:55:44 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Fwd: Bug#947501: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #580670,
regarding ROM: Please remove autodocktools which depends from to be removed 
mgltools-pmv
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
580670: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=580670
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: autodocktools
Version: 1.5.4.cvs.20090603-1
Severity: wishlist

Hi,

I looked at the autodocks plugin for pymol, and unfortunately it seems
to require a couple of scripts from autodocktools (while it is BSD
licensed otherwise):

prepare_receptor4.py
prepare_flexreceptor4.py
prepare_ligand4.py
prepare_gpf4.py
prepare_dpf4.py

Those in term require (at least) mgltools-molkit (which again requires
mgltools-mglutil, but has no Depends on it, I think that's a bug) and
the AutoDockTools.MoleculePreparation class from autodocktools itself.

So having those (and any other non-GUI/biochemsitry oriented python
files) split out into its own (support) package which autodocktools
would depend on would be great - users of the pymol autodock plugin
would not have to download the full mgltools/autodocktools suite (which
runs at 100+ MB here).


Thanks you for considering,

Michael

PS: AutoDock Vina has been released as Open Source, not sure you saw:
http://mgl.scripps.edu/forum/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=889&sid=cf91d83c6960dcb75fed469a1c6e7803

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-2-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, 09 Jan 2020 05:51:08 +0000 Debian FTP Masters 
<[email protected]> wrote:
> We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
> package(s) have been removed from unstable:
> 
> autodocktools |    1.5.7-4 | source, all
> 
> ------------------- Reason -------------------
> RoQA; Python 2, low popcon, depends on mgltools-pmv which is broken
> ----------------------------------------------
> 
> Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
> database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
> The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
> references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
> it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
> master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next
> dinstall run at the earliest.
> 
> Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
> unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
> from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
> problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
> really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.
> 
> We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package
> automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed
> correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package.
> 
> Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
> have further comments please address them to [email protected].
> 
> The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/947501
> 
> This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
> a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
> [email protected].
> 
> Debian distribution maintenance software
> pp.
> Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
> 
> 

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to