Your message dated Wed, 18 Mar 2020 02:51:05 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#954168: Removed package(s) from experimental
has caused the Debian Bug report #954168,
regarding RM: sugar/experimental -- ROM; unrelated clashing package
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
954168: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=954168
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Source package src:sugar is part of the graphical environment "Sugar",
implemented in Python and a bit of C.

The package recently uploaded to experimental by that same source name
but implemented in Java is a different project and should therefore be
named differently, and should _not_ have been approved by ftpmasters.

Please drop it from experimental (and if this has affected the proper
src:sugar package then please adjust as needed).


 - Jonas

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=nsea
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from experimental:

     sugar | 2.0.1-1~exp1 | source

------------------- Reason -------------------
ROM; unrelated clashing package
----------------------------------------------

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next
dinstall run at the earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically
removed from the Bug Tracking System.  Please check all open bugs and
close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package
was superseded by another one.

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected].

The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/954168

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
[email protected].

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to