Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 09:27:40 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#348163: fixed in bugsx 1.08-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---Package: bugsx Version: 1.08-7 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg00004.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Source: bugsx Source-Version: 1.08-9 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of bugsx, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: bugsx_1.08-9.diff.gz to pool/non-free/b/bugsx/bugsx_1.08-9.diff.gz bugsx_1.08-9.dsc to pool/non-free/b/bugsx/bugsx_1.08-9.dsc bugsx_1.08-9_i386.deb to pool/non-free/b/bugsx/bugsx_1.08-9_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated bugsx package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 20:27:24 +0100 Source: bugsx Binary: bugsx Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.08-9 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: bugsx - program to evolve biomorphs using genetic algorithms Closes: 348163 364041 Changes: bugsx (1.08-9) unstable; urgency=high . * Transition to xorg 7 (RC, thus high urgency): - debian/bugsx.files: changed binary and manpage path to match new standard-FHS X layout - build-depend on xutils-dev for imake (closes: 364041, 348163) * A proper review of the license text resulted in: - added the whole text of "distribution policy" and my comment to debian/copyright - moved to non-free - more details in thread starting at: http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/04/msg00221.html * Improved description synopsis a little bit Files: 22e73d227a2ec3b33cefecf2f4251a09 575 non-free/math optional bugsx_1.08-9.dsc e5400709acef1c7762ad3d5af17040b8 2980 non-free/math optional bugsx_1.08-9.diff.gz c2c3fe7aa25992e41395250cadc551e3 332588 non-free/math optional bugsx_1.08-9_i386.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEUnXqOg2KoGD0EhYRAsh0AJ9m2XCN6ufHo00yUrvLYR5mMI9DygCZAbys e6VFmHBSEXuNE7ibSFvBbCM= =IBlJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
