Your message dated Wed, 3 May 2006 17:59:39 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365878: apt-file should depend on wget
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: apt-file
Version: 2.0.3-7
Hi,
As apt-file only recommends "wget", it did not work on a
minimalistic-system with default config for apt.
# apt-file update
sh: line 1: wget: command not found
sh: line 1: wget: command not found
sh: line 1: wget: command not found
sh: line 1: wget: command not found
sh: line 1: wget: command not found
sh: line 1: wget: command not found
sh: line 1: wget: command not found
Shouldn't it depend on wget?
greetings,
hardy
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 03:58:26PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Package: apt-file
> Version: 2.0.3-7
Please update to new version
>
> Hi,
>
> As apt-file only recommends "wget", it did not work on a
> minimalistic-system with default config for apt.
>
> # apt-file update
> sh: line 1: wget: command not found
> sh: line 1: wget: command not found
> sh: line 1: wget: command not found
> sh: line 1: wget: command not found
> sh: line 1: wget: command not found
> sh: line 1: wget: command not found
> sh: line 1: wget: command not found
>
> Shouldn't it depend on wget?
>
> greetings,
> hardy
>
--
Sebastien J. Gross | Debian GNU/Linux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.debian.org
GPG: 1024g/AF0DDC9A AB35 1FFB 1268 56C0 452B 302E 2A25 8421 53BB A490
--- End Message ---
