Your message dated Mon, 20 Apr 2020 17:35:04 +0200
with message-id <20200420153504.GA396424@chou>
and subject line Re: Bug#430155: ipv6 mirror list
has caused the Debian Bug report #430155,
regarding ipv6 mirror list
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
430155: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=430155
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: minor
Tags: ipv6
X-Debbugs-CC: [email protected]
If all hosts in a class (say the ftp.CC.debian.org ones) support ipv6,
that should be recorded on the mirrors page. Otherwise, maybe it is a
good idea to include ipv6 and ipv4 markers as suggested. Here is the
suggestion email to debian-www that I saw:
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 12:27:25 +0200
> From: Bjoern Boschman <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Fwd: [Fwd: ipv6 mirror list]]
> [...]
>
> currently the mirror list [0] doesn't show up which host could be
> reached via IPv6.
> As IPv6 is one of the release goals for etch I would propose to update
> this list.
>
> I collected all given hostnames and attacked my nameserver with AAAA
> queries. The result with FQDNs which already have an IPv6 association
> can be found on my server [1].
> Additionally I like to ask if you may introduce an additional hostname
> schema? Something like [service; e.g. ftp.de.].ipv6.debian.org
>
> [0] http://www.debian.org/mirror/list
> [1] http://jesusch.de/~jesusch/debian/mirrors.ipv6.txt
>
>
> Cheers
> Bjoern
>
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
I don't think this is something we want to maintain in the mirror list.
It's hopefully also less relevant today than it was in 2007.
Closing.
Cheers,
Julien
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 08:44:01PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> Package: www.debian.org
> Severity: minor
> Tags: ipv6
> X-Debbugs-CC: [email protected]
>
> If all hosts in a class (say the ftp.CC.debian.org ones) support ipv6,
> that should be recorded on the mirrors page. Otherwise, maybe it is a
> good idea to include ipv6 and ipv4 markers as suggested. Here is the
> suggestion email to debian-www that I saw:
>
> > Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> > Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 12:27:25 +0200
> > From: Bjoern Boschman <[email protected]>
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: [Fwd: [Fwd: ipv6 mirror list]]
> > [...]
> >
> > currently the mirror list [0] doesn't show up which host could be
> > reached via IPv6.
> > As IPv6 is one of the release goals for etch I would propose to update
> > this list.
> >
> > I collected all given hostnames and attacked my nameserver with AAAA
> > queries. The result with FQDNs which already have an IPv6 association
> > can be found on my server [1].
> > Additionally I like to ask if you may introduce an additional hostname
> > schema? Something like [service; e.g. ftp.de.].ipv6.debian.org
> >
> > [0] http://www.debian.org/mirror/list
> > [1] http://jesusch.de/~jesusch/debian/mirrors.ipv6.txt
> >
> >
> > Cheers
> > Bjoern
> >
>
--- End Message ---
