Your message dated Wed, 16 Dec 2020 19:37:25 -0800
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#977123: Aw: Re: Re: Bug#977123: ldapadd: simple
authentication works without setting of -x
has caused the Debian Bug report #977123,
regarding ldapadd: simple authentication works without setting of -x
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
977123: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=977123
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ldap-utils
Version: 2.4.47+dfsg-3+deb10u4
Severity: minor
Tags: upstream
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Hello,
ldapadd used without -x and without SASL of course performs
a simple bind and add entries to the OpenLDAP server. Other
LDAP clients, e.g. ldapsearch, ldapwhoami, .. still
require -x for simple authentication.
Thank you,
Werner
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.7
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-13-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8),
LANGUAGE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages ldap-utils depends on:
ii libc6 2.28-10
ii libgnutls30 3.6.7-4+deb10u5
ii libldap-2.4-2 2.4.47+dfsg-3+deb10u4
ii libsasl2-2 2.1.27+dfsg-1+deb10u1
Versions of packages ldap-utils recommends:
ii libsasl2-modules 2.1.27+dfsg-1+deb10u1
Versions of packages ldap-utils suggests:
ii libsasl2-modules-gssapi-mit 2.1.27+dfsg-1+deb10u1
- -- no debconf information
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=QuDI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 11:55:09AM -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
There is no bug here. If the -D option is supplied to the ldap
utilities, it immediately implies a simple bind, and the -x option is
not required.
Closing the bug based on this. Thanks Quanah for looking into it!
--- End Message ---
