Your message dated Wed, 23 Dec 2020 22:03:21 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#974435: fixed in apt-forktracer 0.8
has caused the Debian Bug report #974435,
regarding apt-forktracer: autopkgtest must be marked superficial
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
974435: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=974435
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: apt-forktracer
X-Debbugs-CC: [email protected]
Severity: important
Usertags: superficialtest

Dear Maintainer,

It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in apt-forktracer is running a
trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage:

        - apt-forktracer

Executing that command is considered to be a trivial test, which
does not provide significant coverage for a package as a whole.
But these tests are a useful way to detect regressions in dependencies
and prevent them from breaking your package.

However, it is important that we are realistic about the level of
test coverage provided by these commands: most regressions cannot be
detected in this way. So it is not appropriate for packages with only
superficial tests to have the reduced migration time to migrate from
unstable to testing as that means less opportunity for testing by users
compared to the package with no tests.

To support this, the keyword "Restrictions: superficial" has been
defined [1]. Packages where all tests are marked with this keyword are not
considered for the reduced migration age from unstable to testing, and
will not be allowed to migrate automatically in later stages of the
freeze [2].

Its always better to have more extensive testing than having
superficial testing, which again is better than having no test.

Please consider i) Adding a non-trivial test, and/or ii) Mark the
trivial test with "Restrictions: superficial", similar to
[3] or [4].

The Release Team has listed this issue in the list of Release Critical
Issues for bullseye [5] and has mentioned that the test must be marked
superficial if it is not testing one of its own installed binary
packages in some way. As a result, the severity of this bug report might
be increased to serious in future.

[1] 
https://salsa.debian.org/ci-team/autopkgtest/-/blob/master/doc/README.package-tests.rst#defined-restrictions
[2] https://release.debian.org/bullseye/freeze_policy.html
[3] 
https://salsa.debian.org/utopia-team/dbus/-/commit/a80908df7d119b181eec5eb0542634a30c2ad468
[4] 
https://salsa.debian.org/apparmor-team/apparmor/-/commit/580667513a097088ebe579884b38ac8d8666d3b3
[5] https://release.debian.org/bullseye/rc_policy.txt


--
Regards
Sudip

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: apt-forktracer
Source-Version: 0.8
Done: Marcin Owsiany <[email protected]>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
apt-forktracer, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Marcin Owsiany <[email protected]> (supplier of updated apt-forktracer 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [email protected])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 10:52:55 +0100
Source: apt-forktracer
Binary: apt-forktracer
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Marcin Owsiany <[email protected]>
Changed-By: Marcin Owsiany <[email protected]>
Description:
 apt-forktracer - utility for tracking non-official package versions
Closes: 974435
Changes:
 apt-forktracer (0.8) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   [Debian Janitor <[email protected]>]
 .
   * Bump debhelper from old 9 to 12.
   * Set debhelper-compat version in Build-Depends.
   * Use canonical URL in Vcs-Git.
   * Update standards version to 4.5.0, no changes needed.
 .
   [Marcin Owsiany]
 .
   * Add a couple more ways of calling the program, to increase coverage
     enough not to warrant a "superficial" restriction. (Closes: #974435)
   * Update standards version to 4.5.1, no changes needed.
Checksums-Sha1:
 d756234ebdf409fd30673b78402e8e9dab1188f1 1634 apt-forktracer_0.8.dsc
 7037d0aaa949fcab7cf425f5fc947df6725eb72a 34332 apt-forktracer_0.8.tar.xz
 3dab73a4e72ab5bb0087afede13369b4ce113ada 22612 apt-forktracer_0.8_all.deb
 5d0df788778e10f19b1a1ca0261c34a0f586ff1c 6126 
apt-forktracer_0.8_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 cc8b4f2f52489cd84f2a73cb08e7279ac67ddc96cbae7a0615a52b24ce024848 1634 
apt-forktracer_0.8.dsc
 3cb3764438eadfbf87061fdb60e56c3a3f49b0035ce98268959fcea373f8d4dc 34332 
apt-forktracer_0.8.tar.xz
 0301a8d1b79049068449ff693c08a2ef60dfec5c5ae702b56d9b9c33d8184ed2 22612 
apt-forktracer_0.8_all.deb
 535882b623437c4af4b9c850cdebbc8c64dc4d1ff61e0290a82206c8d936346b 6126 
apt-forktracer_0.8_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 057f7445c8fac642008b90dd3f35a321 1634 admin optional apt-forktracer_0.8.dsc
 2994c10d4985d1dee9e76a490be12679 34332 admin optional apt-forktracer_0.8.tar.xz
 54da0164c73c724850c78ba00570ff73 22612 admin optional 
apt-forktracer_0.8_all.deb
 769e0c4eb7c09af652c9f7d591cd1db9 6126 admin optional 
apt-forktracer_0.8_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=swhJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to