Your message dated Sun, 27 Dec 2020 19:21:12 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#898023: notmuch: Please disable gdb build-dependency
on riscv64
has caused the Debian Bug report #898023,
regarding notmuch: Please disable gdb build-dependency on riscv64
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
898023: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=898023
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: notmuch
Version: 0.26.2-1
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: riscv64
Hello,
notmuch depends on gdb, which is not available yet in Debian for the riscv64
architecture.
After a bit of research, it's not clear to me the purpose of build-depending on
gdb. (If you know from the top of your head and can explain briefly it would be
great, I am curious now :) ).
We're generally reluctant to ask to disable dependencies specifically for this
architecture, because we hope to get them available in a reasonable timeframe.
However, since this is also disables in fully supported arches for many years
like s390x, ppc64el or mips*, in this case is probably better to remove it for
riscv64 as well.
It would be great if you could include these changes and release a new version
for unstable soonish.
Thanks and cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <[email protected]>
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
On 2018-05-06 08:55, David Bremner wrote:
> David Bremner <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > David Bremner <[email protected]> writes:
> >
> >>
> >> These architectures have gdb, but it's broken in various ways. They're
> >> also release architectures, where bugs in gdb introduced a regression in
> >> notmuch.
> >
> > I see that some of these architectures have stopped being release
> > architectures since that exclusion was added. Probably that list should
> > be cleaned up.
> >
>
> In the just uploaded 0.26.2-2, I've done that trimming, and marked gdb
> as <!nocheck>, so it need not block bootstrapping efforts.
Thanks for doing so. gbd is available and working fine on riscv64 for
months now, so I do not see the point of keeping this bug open. Closing
it.
Regards,
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
[email protected] http://www.aurel32.net
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
