Your message dated Sun, 3 Jan 2021 13:20:13 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Please preserve the order of attachements
has caused the Debian Bug report #664213,
regarding Please preserve the order of attachements
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
664213: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=664213
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug
Version: 6.3.1
Severity: normal
Hi,
I just reported a bug using:
reportbug -A 0006-multithread-file.patch -A
0007-incremental-string-support.patch -A 0008-copy-context.patch -A
0009-safe-string-updates.patch -A 0010-bigarray-support.patch ocaml-sha
and reportbug later said:
Report will be sent to "Debian Bug Tracking System" <[email protected]>
Attachments:
0007-incremental-string-support.patch
0009-safe-string-updates.patch
0006-multithread-file.patch
0010-bigarray-support.patch
0008-copy-context.patch
Submit this report on ocaml-sha (e to edit) [Y|n|a|c|e|i|l|m|p|q|d|t|s|?]? y
Messing up the order of the patches will make them fail to
apply. Hopefully the leading number will be enough of a clue. But
reportbug should really preserve the order of attachements.
MfG
Goswin
-- Package-specific info:
** Environment settings:
EDITOR="xemacs"
EMAIL="[email protected]"
INTERFACE="text"
** /home/mrvn/.reportbugrc:
reportbug_version "1.99.31"
mode expert
ui text
realname "Goswin von Brederlow"
email "[email protected]"
no-cc
header "X-Debbugs-CC: [email protected]"
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages reportbug depends on:
ii apt 0.8.15.9
ii python 2.7.2-9
ii python-reportbug 6.3.1
reportbug recommends no packages.
Versions of packages reportbug suggests:
ii debconf-utils <none>
ii debsums <none>
ii dlocate <none>
ii emacs23-bin-common 23.3+1-4
ii exim4 4.77-1
ii exim4-daemon-heavy [mail-transport-agent] 4.77-1+b1
ii file 5.09-2
ii gnupg 1.4.11-3
ii python-gtk2 2.24.0-2
ii python-gtkspell <none>
ii python-urwid <none>
ii python-vte <none>
ii xdg-utils 1.1.0~rc1-3
Versions of packages python-reportbug depends on:
ii apt 0.8.15.9
ii python 2.7.2-9
ii python-debian 0.1.21
ii python-debianbts 1.10
ii python-support 1.0.14
python-reportbug suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 7.1.8
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
> reportbug -A 0006-multithread-file.patch -A
> 0007-incremental-string-support.patch -A 0008-copy-context.patch -A
> 0009-safe-string-updates.patch -A 0010-bigarray-support.patch ocaml-sha
>
> and reportbug later said:
>
> Report will be sent to "Debian Bug Tracking System" <[email protected]>
> Attachments:
> 0007-incremental-string-support.patch
> 0009-safe-string-updates.patch
> 0006-multithread-file.patch
> 0010-bigarray-support.patch
> 0008-copy-context.patch
> Submit this report on ocaml-sha (e to edit) [Y|n|a|c|e|i|l|m|p|q|d|t|s|?]? y
>
>
> Messing up the order of the patches will make them fail to
> apply. Hopefully the leading number will be enough of a clue. But
> reportbug should really preserve the order of attachements.
This was fixed in
https://salsa.debian.org/reportbug-team/reportbug/-/commit/e38379447d4b8f8bcc22f9bb0a4dc5dbb9b59d84
--- End Message ---
