Your message dated Fri, 22 Jan 2021 10:19:20 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: ITS: src:gnupg2
has caused the Debian Bug report #979379,
regarding ITS: src:gnupg2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
979379: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=979379
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: src:gnupg2
Version: 2.2.20-1
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian GnuPG Maintainers
<[email protected]>, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
<[email protected]>, Eric Dorland <[email protected]>
Greetings,
as described in the developers' reference, I hereby declare my intention
to salvage the gnugp2 package, with the primary goal of having a recent
upstream version in the upcoming release; and long-term to assert it
will be kept in shape, by (without a particular preference) joining the
team or or taking over maintainership.
According to the "(conservative) criteria" list found in the Debian
wiki:
| A package is eligible for salvaging if it is in clear need of some
| love and care, i.e. there are open bugs,
Lots.
| missing upstream releases,
Several. Debian has 2.20, uploaded in March. Upstream is at 2.26.
There was a "new upstream version availabe" bug report in December 2020:
<https://bugs.debian.org/977863>. This also lists features that are
interesting to have.
| or there is work needed from a quality-assurance perspective;
Possibly yes.
| AND there is the need to upload the package to deal with these issues;
Yes.
| AND at least one of these criteria applies:
| There is no visible activity regarding the package for six months, OR
Yes: Last upload, also commit to salsa was in March 2020:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/gnupg2/-/commits/debian/master
| A previous NMU was not acknowledged, and a bug justifying another
| NMU is pending for one month 1, OR
No
| The last upload was an NMU and there was no maintainer upload
| within one year, OR
No
| Bugs exist for more than one major missing upstream version2 and
| the first bug is older than one year, OR
No
| The package blocks a sourceful transition for six months after a
| transition bug was filed against the package in question.
No
Regards,
Christoph
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 5.4.85 (SMP w/4 CPU threads)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
Versions of packages gnupg depends on:
ii dirmngr 2.2.20-1
ii gnupg-l10n 2.2.20-1
ii gnupg-utils 2.2.20-1
ii gpg 2.2.20-1
ii gpg-agent 2.2.20-1
ii gpg-wks-client 2.2.20-1
ii gpg-wks-server 2.2.20-1
ii gpgsm 2.2.20-1
ii gpgv 2.2.20-1
gnupg recommends no packages.
Versions of packages gnupg suggests:
pn parcimonie <none>
pn xloadimage <none>
-- no debconf information
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Terminating salvaging process
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
