Your message dated Sun, 07 Feb 2021 10:19:08 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#935538: fixed in nextepc 0.3.10+nods-4.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #935538,
regarding nextepc metapackage only installable on amd64, arm64, ppc64el, s390x
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
935538: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=935538
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: nextepc
Version: 0.3.10+nods-3
User: [email protected]
Usertags: origin-ubuntu eoan

Hi Ruben,

In your most recent upload of nextepc, you changed the metapackage to depend
on both nextepc-pcrf and nextepc-hss, instead of recommending these
packages.  These binary packages are only built on 4 architectures (amd64,
arm64, ppc64el, and s390x), whereas other binaries built from the source are
Architecture: any.  The result in that the nextepc metapackage, which is
Architecture: all, has become uninstallable on all other architectures
despite still being available.

This came to my attention because in Ubuntu we run autopkgtests on all
supported architectures, and the nextepc tests now fail on armhf and i386
because they can't install the test dependency (i.e. nextepc).

It's valid to have an architecture: all package that is only installable on
a subset of architectures, but it's unusual to have that be the case when
it's also built from a source package that builds other binaries on all
architectures.

I would suggest that it is better to either have nextepc be an Architecture:
amd64 arm64 ppc64el s390x package, so that it is also only available on
those architectures where it is installable; or do make it Architecture:
any, and make its dependency on netxepc-{pcrf,hss} arch-conditional.  I
don't know which of these would be more "correct" for the intended purpose
of the metapackage.

Cheers,
-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                   https://www.debian.org/
[email protected]                                     [email protected]

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: nextepc
Source-Version: 0.3.10+nods-4.1
Done: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
nextepc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> (supplier of updated nextepc package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [email protected])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2021 18:02:21 +0200
Source: nextepc
Architecture: source
Version: 0.3.10+nods-4.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Mobcom Maintainers 
<[email protected]>
Changed-By: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
Closes: 935538
Changes:
 nextepc (0.3.10+nods-4.1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * Add autopkgtest fix from Steve Langasek. (Closes: #935538)
Checksums-Sha1:
 6082322495321ad8b7e8e9a98a1ddea2dafab3e3 2503 nextepc_0.3.10+nods-4.1.dsc
 0081cca3b3473cf97e16ba4ef8f37aa7ad09a751 19956 
nextepc_0.3.10+nods-4.1.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 5c582aa23dbc612b25d6c40b052a6f79a9ccd7035a6b02ddd28cf3afcfd585b0 2503 
nextepc_0.3.10+nods-4.1.dsc
 c42fce10fee1f1670f77d31f18254cd28525aa4fa2626f297f1bfa3f2fe32c71 19956 
nextepc_0.3.10+nods-4.1.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 39bb802d16a2bbd23a71e487794468d3 2503 net optional nextepc_0.3.10+nods-4.1.dsc
 87ed854eca8616d50222c1c4fd748cc9 19956 net optional 
nextepc_0.3.10+nods-4.1.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEOvp1f6xuoR0v9F3wiNJCh6LYmLEFAmAev28ACgkQiNJCh6LY
mLHXbw/+N8rL2QX7t/trQJCwCofrxWSKLd/Sk8zU2mNGz7amAWSSo0lnqNP+zi9l
D9Wpz9iBokY2WvoG3krjpUSYIdCTmIo/Zh29TS9O8S2zwTgb1IMohhpy657Hj+TM
BIv5K05xCAaYABvEmQyTYAsCv3PdFxkS5QPe1zsO/ZOCSHR0Dd/70RmKPMVDxWri
wCRQUogeL1UySeVghcyHdK8+6ogxpl8AqNXqLuIMvnmZorbGJgg+aY8UNYDhLGiS
uDSO7lN1Y36RHh27r8mYrI/X/CVnXWKcq1gI2j5zMHWUgcJwnNyn34jZF4lxwdDb
mq2tfpjLHeJK22NtIMOPqKvHHUmw98iOWrYfs7+COjSuX4G1U5stYOF66nKw02fP
FwkULRMt5DLWzdp2bR4C8+59IUoRck4dhuo3yIdaJhwkIU6Y9e55KhvzJmX/DsDW
G1voxH0KjFpMxdJJ7EetZxd35QQ3ZjPSzZ5pcWOqlBboiUAuyemKNUukH3z0Zlz5
2anO5MbAPDNQIFh9hFUyFQc3d7avo8uo/ZDGA9LUjDqOXgLEfPYLVWdvuIBBXjzW
iRNn0uwLlwf6HFlbj+DWSj4sl7ATENjWbr3T1/Pzd6z6w8KLgv2L2QEBTvv0JQ+J
j914IiPak2Hr2tZQkXuRQ116QIDvc2uFmUhejTJ73ffytAwMQOI=
=cW0u
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to