Your message dated Sat, 20 Feb 2021 13:19:20 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: sdpb: FTBFS on mipsel
has caused the Debian Bug report #960656,
regarding sdpb: FTBFS on mipsel
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
960656: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=960656
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: sdpb
Version: 1.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs sid bullseye
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
sdpb failed to build on mipsel while rebuilding for the tinyxml2
transition:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=sdpb&arch=mipsel&ver=1.0-3%2Bb5&stamp=1589492907&raw=0
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.0-4
sdpb no longer FTBFS on mipsel
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=sdpb&arch=mipsel&ver=1.0-4&stamp=1613823438&raw=0
--
Michael R. Crusoe
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
