Your message dated Sat, 13 Mar 2021 22:48:10 +0100
with message-id <09596f35-fc42-a9f6-06a1-ff9e2d5c6...@debian.org>
and subject line release notes bug for EOL Debian release
has caused the Debian Bug report #828746,
regarding hwclock: RTC to wrong offset after reboot
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
828746: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=828746
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: util-linux
Version: 2.28-5
Severity: important
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Whenever rebooting this host, the RTC time is 3 hours ahead of what it should
be. This wasn't the case when using whatever is currently in Debian/stable.
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (1001, 'testing'), (1001, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i586)
Kernel: Linux 4.6.0-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=fi_FI.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
Versions of packages util-linux depends on:
ii libblkid1 2.28-5
ii libc6 2.22-11
ii libfdisk1 2.28-5
ii libmount1 2.28-5
ii libncursesw5 6.0+20160319-1
ii libpam0g 1.1.8-3.3
ii libselinux1 2.5-3
ii libsmartcols1 2.28-5
ii libsystemd0 230-2
ii libtinfo5 6.0+20160319-1
ii libudev1 230-2
ii libuuid1 2.28-5
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.8.dfsg-2+b1
util-linux recommends no packages.
Versions of packages util-linux suggests:
ii dosfstools 4.0-2
ii kbd 2.0.3-2
pn util-linux-locales <none>
- -- Configuration Files:
/etc/default/hwclock changed:
HWCLOCKACCESS=yes
- -- debconf information excluded
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=53CV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Dear reporter,
Thanks for taking the time long ago to submit your release notes bug.
I'm closing these reports now because the Debian releases they were
reported against have reached their end-of-life (some long ago).
Unfortunately it's possible that the report I'm now closing may still
have relevant information for the current release (bullseye). If you
believe that's the case, don't hesitate to reopen the bug, retitle it
and provide further information and it will be seen during the current
freeze period of Debian.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---