Your message dated Wed, 17 Mar 2021 01:29:48 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: systemd-nspawn: can not run any command related changing
the timestamp of files in the i386 bullseye chroot
has caused the Debian Bug report #983567,
regarding Subject: systemd-nspawn: can not run any command related changing the
timestamp of files in the i386 bullseye chroot
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
983567: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=983567
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: systemd-container
Version: 241-7~deb10u4
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I enter to the bullseye chroot with i386 architecture by systemd-nspawn command,
and i can't run any command related changing the timestamp of files as below:
debian-buster:~$ mkdir chroot-bullseye-i386
debian-buster:~$ sudo debootstrap --arch=i386 bullseye chroot-bullseye-i386
http://deb.debian.org/debian/
debian-buster:~$ sudo systemd-nspawn -q --resolv-conf=off --timezone=off -D
chroot-bullseye-i386
root@chroot-bullseye-i386:~# touch /usr/bin/bootctl
touch: setting times of '/usr/bin/bootctl': Operation not permitted
root@chroot-bullseye-i386:~# date
Thu Jan 1 00:00:01 UTC 1970
Is this bug of systemd-container package?
Thanks,
Binh.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 247-1
I looked into this a bit more.
A git bisect finds that this is fixed by the following commit
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/3573e032f
Unfortunately, this is not reasonably backportable to stable, i.e. 241.
I'm thus closing the bug report, marking it as fixed in 247-1.
Using the 247 package from buster-backports might hopefully be a
reasonable alternative if this issue is important to you.
Regards,
Michael
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
